Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;157(2):347-352.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13787. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

The impact of prolonged second stage in twins on perinatal outcomes

Affiliations

The impact of prolonged second stage in twins on perinatal outcomes

Ragda Zidan et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the duration of the second stage of labor in twin pregnancies in relation to maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective study between 2014 and 2020. Eligible cases were twin pregnancies that reached the second stage. The pre-defined groups were based on the total time spent in the second stage of labor; Group 1 (<1 h), group 2 (1-2 h), and group 3 (>2 h), which was considered the prolonged second stage group.

Results: Among the 439 planned vaginal births, successful vaginal delivery of both twins was achieved in 63.8%. Prolonged second stage was observed in 25.8% (89/345). Nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 7.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-13.4) and use of epidural analgesia (OR 5.45, 95% CI 1.2-24.7), were the only independent variables significantly associated with prolonged second stage. Prolonged second stage was associated with a greater risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery (32.6%, P < 0.001), combined delivery (10.1%, P < 0.001), chorioamnionitis (8.3%, P = 0.006) and a admission to neonatal intensive care unit of at least one of the twins (30.3%, P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Prolonged second stage of labor affects maternal and fetal outcome in twin pregnancies.

Keywords: outcome; pregnancy; second stage of labor; twins; vaginal delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Friedman EA. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68(6):1568-1575.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179-193.
    1. Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):57-67.
    1. Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Perils of the new labor management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):420-427.
    1. Leveno KJ, Nelson DB, McIntire DD. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):484-489.

LinkOut - more resources