Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;14(1):143-162.
doi: 10.1111/tops.12551. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

Cognitive Network Science for Understanding Online Social Cognitions: A Brief Review

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive Network Science for Understanding Online Social Cognitions: A Brief Review

Massimo Stella. Top Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Social media are digitalizing massive amounts of users' cognitions in terms of timelines and emotional content. Such Big Data opens unprecedented opportunities for investigating cognitive phenomena like perception, personality, and information diffusion but requires suitable interpretable frameworks. Since social media data come from users' minds, worthy candidates for this challenge are cognitive networks, models of cognition giving structure to mental conceptual associations. This work outlines how cognitive network science can open new, quantitative ways for understanding cognition through online media like: (i) reconstructing how users semantically and emotionally frame events with contextual knowledge unavailable to machine learning, (ii) investigating conceptual salience/prominence through knowledge structure in social discourse; (iii) studying users' personality traits like openness-to-experience, curiosity, and creativity through language in posts; (iv) bridging cognitive/emotional content and social dynamics via multilayer networks comparing the mindsets of influencers and followers. These advancements combine cognitive-, network- and computer science to understand cognitive mechanisms in both digital and real-world settings but come with limitations concerning representativeness, individual variability, and data integration. Such aspects are discussed along with the ethical implications of manipulating sociocognitive data. In the future, reading cognitions through networks and social media can expose cognitive biases amplified by online platforms and relevantly inform policy-making, education, and markets about complex cognitive trends.

Keywords: Cognition; Cognitive network science; Complex networks; Emotional profiling; Information processing; Language modelling; Online platforms; Social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Downing, J., & Seguí, F. L. (2020). COVID-19 and the 5 G conspiracy theory: Social network analysis of Twitter data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(5), e19458.
    1. Abbas, K., Amico, E., Svaldi, D. O., Tipnis, U., Duong-Tran, D.A., Liu, M., Rajapandian, M., Harezlak, J., Ances, B. M., & Goñi, J. (2020). GEFF: Graph embedding for functional fingerprinting. NeuroImage, 221, 117181.
    1. Amancio, D. R., Oliveira Jr, O. N., & Costa, L. D. F. (2012). Structure-semantics interplay in complex networks and its effects on the predictability of similarity in texts. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(18), 4406-4419.
    1. Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., & Lowe, J. B. (1998). August). The Berkeley FrameNet project. In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1, pp. 86-90). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistic.
    1. Beckage, N. M., & Colunga, E. (2019). Network growth modeling to capture individual lexical learning. Complexity, 2019, 7690869.

LinkOut - more resources