Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;5(6):e386-e394.
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00112-1.

A better classification of wet markets is key to safeguarding human health and biodiversity

Affiliations
Review

A better classification of wet markets is key to safeguarding human health and biodiversity

Bing Lin et al. Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Wet markets have been implicated in multiple zoonotic outbreaks, including COVID-19. They are also a conduit for legal and illegal trade in wildlife, which threatens thousands of species. Yet wet markets supply food to millions of people around the world, and differ drastically in their physical composition, the goods they sell, and the subsequent risks they pose. As such, policy makers need to know how to target their actions to efficiently safeguard human health and biodiversity without depriving people of ready access to food. Here, we propose a taxonomy of wet markets, oriented around the presence of live or dead animals, and whether those animals are domesticated or wild (either captive-reared or wild-caught). We assess the dimensions and levels of risk that different types of wet markets pose to people and to biodiversity. We identify six key risk factors of wet markets that can affect human health: (1) presence of high disease-risk animal taxa, (2) presence of live animals, (3) hygiene conditions, (4) market size, (5) animal density and interspecies mixing, and (6) the length and breadth of animal supply chains. We also identify key factors informing risk to biodiversity. Finally, we recommend targeted, risk-adjusted policies to more efficiently and humanely address the dangers posed by wet markets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Wet markets, live-animal markets, and wildlife markets Markets are separated on three dimensions on the basis of the condition, type, and intended usage of its animals: alive versus dead, domesticated versus wild, and consumption-oriented versus not consumption-oriented.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Animal markets classified according to the types of goods sold Wet markets sell consumption-oriented, perishable goods, whereas other types of markets sell animals and animal products in other forms, oriented for other purposes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A taxonomy of EID and biodiversity risk across wet market types EID=emerging infectious disease. NA=not applicable.

References

    1. Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus–infected pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1199–1207. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . World Health Organization; 2021. WHO-convened global study of origins of SARS-CoV-2: China part.
    1. Walzer C, Kang A. Abolish Asia's ‘wet markets,’ where pandemics breed. Wall Street Journal. Jan 27, 2020 https://www.wsj.com/articles/abolish-asias-wet-markets-where-pandemics-b...
    1. Moore C. Scott Morrison joins forces with EU to ban wet markets. Daily Mail. April 29, 2020. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8267849/Scott-Morrison-joins-fo...
    1. Farsides S. UN Biodiversity Chief calls for a global ban on “wet markets” to prevent future pandemics. International Observatory of Human Rights. April 6, 2020. https://observatoryihr.org/news/un-biodiversity-chief-calls-for-a-global...

Publication types