Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;39(3):271-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

COVID diagnostics by molecular methods: A systematic review of nucleic acid based testing systems

Parijat Das  1 , Sudipto Mondal  2 , Soumik Pal  2 , Samadrita Roy  2 , Anju Vidyadharan  2 , Rajneesh Dadwal  2 , Sanjay Bhattacharya  2 , Deepak Kumar Mishra  3 , Mammen Chandy  4
Affiliations

COVID diagnostics by molecular methods: A systematic review of nucleic acid based testing systems

Parijat Das et al. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The selection of appropriate kit and PCR equipment for the detection of SARS CoV-2 is critically important in view of many options available in the diagnostic market. Since last year many molecular products are available for COVID-19 diagnostics., some of these diagnostics have become commercially available for healthcare workers and clinical laboratories. However, the diagnostic technologies have specific limitations and reported several false-positive and false-negative cases, especially during the early stages of kit development and use. The current article addresses these and other relevant questions important to the medical microbiologists running or aspiring to run COVID diagnostic services using PCR and related technologies.

Methods: In this Systematic Review we follow Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). A total of 258 citations retrieved, among those 77 peer reviewed articles was assessed for eligibility, and 181 studies were excluded. Based on inclusion criteria final data extraction was done.

Results: The question of diagnostic dilemma has also been addressed in view of discordant results between assays, inter-test variability, repeat testing requirements in specific settings and inconclusive or indeterminate results. Kit efficiency was satisfactory for all assays and the estimates varied within sample types and technology. Using clinical samples, we observed some variations in detection rate between kits. Importantly, none of the assays showed cross-reactivity with other respiratory (corona) viruses, except as expected for the SARS-CoV-1 E-gene.

Conclusions: We conclude SARS CoV-2 related molecular assays differed considerably in performance. Hence we need to understand importance of molecular diagnostics test interpretation in light of the latest pandemic virus.

Keywords: CBNAAT; COVID; Isothermal amplification; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Oran D.P., Topol E.J. Prevalence of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ann. Intern. Med., Jun. 2020 doi: 10.7326/m20-3012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Q&A: Influenza and COVID-19 - similarities and differences. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question... (accessed Jun. 12, 2020)
    1. Weiss S.R., Leibowitz J.L. Vol. 81. Academic Press Inc.; 2011. Coronavirus Pathogenesis; pp. 85–164. (Advances in Virus Research).
    1. Song Z., et al. From SARS to MERS, thrusting coronaviruses into the spotlight. Viruses. Jan. 2019;11(1):59. doi: 10.3390/v11010059. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu A., et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe. Mar. 2020;27(3):325–328. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types