Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021;8(6):989-1001.
doi: 10.3233/JND-210643.

Open-Label Evaluation of Eteplirsen in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Amenable to Exon 51 Skipping: PROMOVI Trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Open-Label Evaluation of Eteplirsen in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Amenable to Exon 51 Skipping: PROMOVI Trial

Craig M McDonald et al. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021.

Abstract

BackgroundEteplirsen received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping, based on demonstrated dystrophin production.ObjectiveTo report results from PROMOVI, a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluating efficacy and safety of eteplirsen in a larger cohort.MethodsAmbulatory patients aged 7-16 years, with confirmed mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping, received eteplirsen 30 mg/kg/week intravenously for 96 weeks. An untreated cohort with DMD not amenable to exon 51 skipping was also enrolled.Results78/79 eteplirsen-treated patients completed 96 weeks of treatment. 15/30 untreated patients completed the study; this cohort was considered an inappropriate control group because of genotype-driven differences in clinical trajectory. At Week 96, eteplirsen-treated patients showed increased exon skipping (18.7-fold) and dystrophin protein (7-fold) versus baseline. Post-hoc comparisons with patients from eteplirsen phase 2 studies (4658-201/202) and mutation-matched external natural history controls confirmed previous results, suggesting clinically notable attenuation of decline on the 6-minute walk test over 96 weeks (PROMOVI: -68.9 m; phase 2 studies: -67.3 m; external controls: -133.8 m) and significant attenuation of percent predicted forced vital capacity annual decline (PROMOVI: -3.3%, phase 2 studies: -2.2%, external controls: -6.0%; p < 0.001). Adverse events were generally mild to moderate and unrelated to eteplirsen. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events were headache and vomiting; none led to treatment discontinuation.ConclusionsThis large, multicenter study contributes to the growing body of evidence for eteplirsen, confirming a positive treatment effect, favorable safety profile, and slowing of disease progression versus natural history.

Keywords: Muscular dystrophy; clinical trial; duchenne; phase 3; safety; treatment efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C. M. McDonald reports consulting (Astellas/Mitobridge, Bristol Myers Squibb, Capricor, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, Edgewise Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Epirium Bio [formerly Cardero Therapeutics], Gilead, Halo Therapeutics, Italfarmaco, Novartis, Pfizer, Prosensa, PTC Pharmaceuticals, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.), and research funding, principal investigator, and speaking fees (Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.). P. B. Shieh reports consulting fees for ad hoc advisory boards (AveXis, Biogen, PTC Therapeutics, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.) and speakers’ bureau participation (Alexion, Biogen, and Grifols). H. Z. Abdel-Hamid reports advisory board participation (Audentes, AveXis, Biogen, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.). A. M. Connolly reports advisory board participation (Acceleron, AveXis, Genentech, NS Pharma, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Scholar Rock) and DMSB participation (Catabasis). E. Ciafaloni reports advisory board participation (AveXis, Biogen, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.). K. R. Wagner reports consulting fees (AskBio, Dyne, Vita, Dynacure, PTC Therapeutics, Roche, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc). N. Goemans reports advisory board participations and/or speaking fees (Italfarmaco, Biogen, Roche, AveXis, Pfizer, PTC Pharmaceuticals, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, and Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.). E. Mercuri reports paid consulting (Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.). J. R. Mendell reports receiving grants (Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy) and consulting fees (Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and Nationwide Children’s Hospital). N. Khan, E. Koenig, J. Malhotra, W. Zhang, and B. Han are employees of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and own stock/options in the company.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram and analysis subsets. Abbreviations: CINRG = Cooperative International Neuromuscular Research Group; DNHS = Duchenne Natural History Study (DNHS); FVC%p = percent predicted forced vital capacity; LOA = loss of ambulation; 6MWT = 6-minute walk test; NSAA = North Star Ambulatory Assessment. aEteplirsen studies 201 (NCT01396239) [24] and 202 (NCT01540409) [28]. bUntreated patients in the CINRG DNHS exon 51 cohort (age 10–18 years) [11]. cItalian DMD Telethon Registry [12, 25, 26] and the Leuven NMRC Registry [27].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Exon 51 skipping by quantitative ddPCR (A), dystrophin protein quantification by western blot (B), percentage of dystrophin-positive fibers by IHC (C) and dystrophin intensity by IHC (D) from Baseline to Week 96 in eteplirsen-treated patients. Abbreviations: SE = standard error. *p < 0.05. p < 0.001. aMean of individual patient fold changes. bp value is based on one-sample permutation t-test.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Post-hoc analysis: Mean change from baseline to Week 96 in 6MWT (A), and FVC%p (B) in eteplirsen-treated patients and matched comparisons. Abbreviations: FVC%p = percent predicted forced vital capacity; 6MWT = 6-minute walk test; SE = standard error. aAt Weeks 12, 72, and 96 (n = 41). One patient did not have a value at Week 12, but had at later visits. Another patient withdrew after Week 48. bEteplirsen studies 201 (NCT01396239) [24] and 202 (NCT01540409) [28]. cItalian DMD Telethon Registry [12, 25, 26] and the Leuven NMRC Registry [27]. dUntreated patients in the CINRG DNHS exon 51 cohort (age 10–18 years) [11].

References

    1. Birnkrant DJ, Bushby K, Bann CM, Apkon SD, Blackwell A, Brumbaugh D, et al.. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part diagnosis, and neuromuscular, rehabilitation, endocrine, and gastrointestinal and nutritional management. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(3):251–67. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30024-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crisafulli S, Sultana J, Fontana A, Salvo F, Messina S, Trifiro G. Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01430-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peverelli L, Testolin S, Villa L, D’Amico A, Petrini S, Favero C, et al.. Histologic muscular history in steroid-treated and untreated patients with Duchenne dystrophy. Neurology. 2015;85(21):1886–93. doi: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al.. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part implementation of multidisciplinary care. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(2):177–89. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70272-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al.. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):77–93. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70271-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types