Shift From a Traditional to a Distance Learning Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: University Students' Engagement and Interactions
- PMID: 34121814
- PMCID: PMC8186022
- DOI: 10.1007/s11191-021-00234-x
Shift From a Traditional to a Distance Learning Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: University Students' Engagement and Interactions
Abstract
The paper reports a study aimed at investigating tertiary education students' engagement and interactions in the traditional face-to-face learning environment and the sequentially applied distance online learning environment imposed by the sudden upsurge of a worldwide health emergency, the COVID-19 pandemic in Spring 2020. The study took place in four distinct science learning communities formed by a total of 347 undergraduate students attending three different academic majors (Chemistry, Environmental Science, and Food Science and Technology) and 13 postgraduate students attending a Masters program related to Chemistry Education, in two Greek universities. The majority of the measured variables were shown to depend on the institution, the academic major, and the semester of study, although to a varying degree. Data analysis provided evidence for a statistically significant lower level of emotional engagement in the online relative to the traditional learning environment among the students of all three undergraduate learning communities. Multiple regression analysis showed that this documented decrease in students' emotional engagement is largely explained by the concurrent decrease at the level of human interaction (either student-student or student-instructor) upon the passage from the traditional to the online learning environment.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Al-Gahtani SS. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics. 2016;12(1):27–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001. - DOI
-
- Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Kim D, Reschly AL. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology. 2006;44(5):427–445. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002. - DOI
-
- Artino AR, Jr, Stephens JM. Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online. The Internet and Higher Education. 2009;12(3–4):146–151. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.02.001. - DOI
-
- Ashwin, P., & McVitty, D. (2015). The meanings of student engagement Implications for policies and practices. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European Higher Education Area. (pp. 343–359). Springer.
-
- Bateman, H. V. (2002). Sense of community in the school. In A. T. Fisher, C. C. Sonn, & B. J. Bishop (Eds.), Psychological sense of community: Research, applications, and implications. (pp. 161–179). Springer.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources