Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 21:19:168-174.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.019. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Re-tears after rotator cuff repair: Current concepts review

Affiliations

Re-tears after rotator cuff repair: Current concepts review

Avanthi Mandaleson. J Clin Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Re-tear following rotator cuff repair is common and has been reported to range from between 13 and 94% despite satisfactory clinical outcomes following rotator cuff surgery. Various risk factors have been associated with an increased tear rate, including patient factors, tear and shoulder morphology, repair technique, and rehabilitation regimes. Different modes of rotator cuff failure have been described. The management of re-tear in patients following rotator cuff repair is challenging and depends on the age, functional status and requirements of the patient, and re-tear size and residual tendon length. This article aims to review the factors associated with rotator cuff re-tear. It describes which of these are associated with poor clinical outcomes, and discusses the long-term outcomes of re-tear and treatment options.

Keywords: Failed repair; Re-tear; Revision surgery; Rotator cuff; Shoulder; Superior capsular reconstruction; Tendon transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Shoulder X-Ray measuring critical shoulder angle (CSA) of 37°.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MRI Sagittal PD image showing severe atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus muscle.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MRI findings of failed rotator cuff repairs (A) Type 1 failure with no residual tendon attached to tuberosity footprint with major discontinuity, (B) Type 2 failure with tendon stump attached to footprint and medial tendon failure and major discontinuity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jost B., Zumstein M., Pfirrmann C.W.A., Gerber C. Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(3):472–479. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Russell R.D., Knight J.R., Mulligan E., Khazzam M.S. Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(4):265–271. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim K.C., Shin H.D., Lee W.Y., Han S.C. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: double-row versus suture-bridge technique. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(2):294–299. doi: 10.1177/0363546511425657. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diebold G., Lam P., Walton J., Murrell G.A.C. Relationship between age and rotator cuff retear: a study of 1,600 consecutive rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(14):1198–1205. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00770. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu M.C., O'Donnell E.A., Taylor S.A. Delay to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is associated with increased risk of revision rotator cuff surgery. Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):340–344. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20200923-02. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources