Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 27:17:11163.
doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11163.

An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students

Jaideep S Talwalkar  1 , Auguste H Fortin  2 , Laura J Morrison  3 , Alan Kliger  4 , David I Rosenthal  5 , Tanya Murtha  6 , Matthew S Ellman  7
Affiliations

An Advanced Communication Skills Workshop Using Standardized Patients for Senior Medical Students

Jaideep S Talwalkar et al. MedEdPORTAL. .

Abstract

Introduction: Medical students often lack training in advanced communication skills encompassing emotionally fraught situations and those in which an intense emotional response is expected. Such skills are required for clinical situations encountered during residency. We created and evaluated an advanced communication skills workshop (ACSW) using standardized patients for senior medical students. The workshop emphasized communication skills for four scenarios-strong emotion, goals of care, medical error, and palliative care assessment-and utilized formative peer assessment and feedback.

Methods: We created the four ACSW cases with case-specific communication behavior checklists and a common modified Master Interview Rating Scale in a Capstone Course for senior medical students. In groups of three, students rotated through three of four stations. Each student conducted one of the interviews while the other two completed the checklists and provided verbal feedback. We performed one-way analyses of variance on Likert responses and content analysis on open responses on a post-ACSW survey.

Results: Ninety-one students completed the ACSW and survey. Students assigned high value to all four ACSW student roles: interviewer, observer, feedback recipient, and feedback provider. Students rated the experience above average to excellent on nearly all survey items. Open-response themes included "liked the opportunity to give or receive peer feedback" (46%) and "found the checklists helpful" (45%).

Discussion: Feasible and well received by senior medical students, our ACSW offers an opportunity to practice and observe advanced communication skills and peer feedback. A peer-assisted, formative learning model, the ACSW efficiently addresses a key aspect of residency preparation.

Keywords: Clinical Skills Assessment/OSCEs; Communication Skills; End of Life/Palliative Care; Goals of Care; Medical Errors; Peer-Assisted Learning; Standardized Patient; Strong Emotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Elder A. Clinical skills assessment in the twenty-first century. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(3):545–558. 10.1016/j.mcna.2017.12.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fortin AH VI, Dwamena FC, Frankel RM, Lepisto BL, Smith RC. Smith's Patient-Centered Interviewing: An Evidence-Based Method. 4th ed. McGraw Hill Education; 2019.
    1. Davignon P, Young A, Johnson D. Medical board complaints against physicians due to communication: analysis of North Carolina Medical Board data, 2002–2012. J Med Regul. 2014;100(2):28–31. 10.30770/2572-1852-100.2.28 - DOI
    1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree. Liaison Committee on Medical Education; 2020.
    1. Khan R, Payne MWC, Chahine S. Peer assessment in the objective structured clinical examination: a scoping review. Med Teach. 2017;39(7):745–756. 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1309375 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources