Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;174(8):1081-1089.
doi: 10.7326/M21-0319. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in the United States: Insights From the National Football League Occupational Health Program

Affiliations

Optimizing SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in the United States: Insights From the National Football League Occupational Health Program

Christina DeFilippo Mack et al. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Evidence to understand effective strategies for surveillance and early detection of SARS-CoV-2 is limited.

Objective: To describe the results of a rigorous, large-scale COVID-19 testing and monitoring program.

Design: The U.S. National Football League (NFL) and the NFL Players Association (NFLPA) instituted a large-scale COVID-19 monitoring program involving daily testing using 2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) platforms (Roche cobas and Thermo Fisher QuantStudio), a transcription-mediated amplification platform (Hologic Panther), and an antigen point-of-care (aPOC) test (Quidel Sofia).

Setting: 32 NFL clubs in 24 states during the 2020 NFL season.

Participants: NFL players and staff.

Measurements: SARS-CoV-2 test results were described in the context of medically adjudicated status. Cycle threshold (Ct) values are reported when available.

Results: A total of 632 370 tests administered across 11 668 persons identified 270 (2.4%) COVID-19 cases from 1 August to 14 November 2020. Positive predictive values ranged from 73.0% to 82.0% across the RT-PCR platforms. High Ct values (33 to 37) often indicated early infection. For the first positive result, the median Ct value was 32.77 (interquartile range, 30.02 to 34.72) and 22% of Ct values were above 35. Among adjudicated COVID-19 cases tested with aPOC, 42.3% had a negative result. Positive concordance between aPOC test result and adjudicated case status increased as viral load increased.

Limitations: Platforms varied by laboratory, and test variability may reflect procedural differences.

Conclusion: Routine RT-PCR testing allowed early detection of infection. Cycle threshold values provided a useful guidepost for understanding results, with high values often indicating early infection. Antigen POC testing was unable to reliably rule out COVID-19 early in infection.

Primary funding source: The NFL and the NFLPA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M21-0319.

Figures

Visual Abstract.
Visual Abstract.. SARS-CoV-2 Surveillance in the National Football League.
This study describes the experience of the National Football League (NFL)/NFL Players Association COVID-19 Testing and Surveillance Program during the 2020 NFL season and sheds insight into the utility of daily testing across multiple platforms in mitigating the spread of infection.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.. COVID-19 case adjudication algorithm.
RT-PCR = reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. * Any “positive” result includes positive, presumptive positive, or inconclusive results. † If the adjudication team learned of symptoms that presented later, case status was updated to a COVID-19 case, regardless of subsequent test results. ‡ Same-sample confirmatory testing began on 24 August 2020 and was performed for all samples. From 1 August to 23 August, samples with a positive next-day RT-PCR result were considered COVID-19 cases. Positive results required 2 consecutive days of negative follow-up testing to be considered an adjudicated negative case. Any other test result sequence required case determination by medical team consensus. If insufficient follow-up testing was done, the case status was deemed “unable to determine.” § Persons with a positive point-of-care test result were largely considered COVID-19 cases, regardless of the same-day confirmatory test result, although these results were discussed by the medical team. || If no symptoms were present, clubs were encouraged to do follow-up PCR testing of all asymptomatic/presymptomatic persons, regardless of the confirmatory test result. Sixty-five of 709 initial positive results were among asymptomatic/presymptomatic persons who did not have follow-up testing, 52 of which were adjudicated as COVID-19 cases due to positive same-sample confirmatory test results. ¶ Of 709 initial positive test results, 270 were adjudicated as COVID-19 cases (87 of which were symptomatic at the time of the positive result), 429 were adjudicated as negative, and 10 were deemed “unable to determine.” ** Medical team consensus considered testing history, further testing (if available), serologic status, and exposure to other positive persons. All persons reviewed by the medical team were assigned a case status of “COVID-19 case” or “adjudicated negative.”.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. COVID-19 incidence per 1000 persons, by week, 1 August to 14 November 2020.
CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; NFL = National Football League. * Includes cases from all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data were obtained on 7 May 2021 from https://data.cdc.gov/Case-Surveillance/United-States-COVID-19-Cases-and-Deaths-by-State-o/9mfq-cb36. † All intervals represent 7-day weeks except the first interval, which represents 1 August to 8 August.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Updated 21 December 2020. Accessed at www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 on 21 December 2020.
    1. Grassly NC , Pons-Salort M , Parker EPK , et al; Imperial College COVID-19 Response Team. Comparison of molecular testing strategies for COVID-19 control: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:1381-9. [PMID: ] doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30630-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang Y . Large-scale national screening for coronavirus disease 2019 in China. J Med Virol. 2020;92:2266-8. [PMID: ] doi: 10.1002/jmv.26173 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Luo Z , Ang MJY , Chan SY , et al. Combating the coronavirus pandemic: early detection, medical treatment, and a concerted effort by the global community. Research (Wash D C). 2020;2020:6925296. [PMID: ] doi: 10.34133/2020/6925296 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Rockefeller Foundation. National Covid-19 Testing and Tracing Action Plan. Update Report. Accessed at www.rockefellerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/TheRockefellerF... on 2 December 2020.