Cryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells: the right answer for transplantations during the COVID-19 pandemic?
- PMID: 34127808
- PMCID: PMC8201455
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01367-x
Cryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells: the right answer for transplantations during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Erratum in
-
Correction: Cryopreservation of unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cells: the right answer for transplantations during the COVID-19 pandemic?Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Aug;59(8):1206. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02318-y. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024. PMID: 38806675 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Cryopreservation was recommended to ensure continuity of unrelated donor (UD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during COVID-19 pandemic. However, its impact on clinical outcomes and feasibility was not well known. We compared 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) during the COVID-19 pandemic with 32 patients who underwent UD HSCT using fresh PBSC in the previous period. Median neutrophil engraftment was 17.5 and 17.0 days with cryopreserved and fresh grafts, respectively. Non-significant delays were found in platelet recovery days (25.5 versus 19.0; P = 0.192) and full donor chimerism days (35.0 and 31.5; P = 0.872) using cryopreserved PBSC. The rate of acute graft-versus-host disease at 100 days was 41% (95% CI [21-55%]) in cryopreserved group versus 31% (95% CI [13-46%]) in fresh group (P = 0.380). One-hundred days progression-relapse free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly. During COVID-19 pandemic, six frozen UD donations were not transfused and logistical and clinical issues regarding cryopreservation procedure, packaging, and transporting appeared. In summary, UD HSCT with cryopreserved PBSC was safe during this challenging time. More efforts are needed to ensure that all frozen grafts are transplanted and cryopreservation requirements are harmonized.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Frey NV, Lazarus HM, Goldstein SC. Has allogeneic stem cell cryopreservation been given the “cold shoulder”? An analysis of the pros and cons of using frozen versus fresh stem cell products in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2006;38:399–405. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705462. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) regarding the situation generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020. https://www.ebmt.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/EBMT%20COVID-19%20guide....
-
- Recommendations of the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) regarding donor medical suitability in the situation generated by the COVID-19 pandemic 2021. https://share.wmda.info/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=344866320.
-
- Hamadani M, Zhang MJ, Tang XY, Fei M, Brunstein C, Chhabra S, et al. Graft cryopreservation does not impact overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2020;26:1312–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.04.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
