Deconvoluting the T Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2: Specificity Versus Chance and Cognate Cross-Reactivity
- PMID: 34127926
- PMCID: PMC8196231
- DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.635942
Deconvoluting the T Cell Response to SARS-CoV-2: Specificity Versus Chance and Cognate Cross-Reactivity
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 infection takes a mild or clinically inapparent course in the majority of humans who contract this virus. After such individuals have cleared the virus, only the detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific immunological memory can reveal the exposure, and hopefully the establishment of immune protection. With most viral infections, the presence of specific serum antibodies has provided a reliable biomarker for the exposure to the virus of interest. SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, does not reliably induce a durable antibody response, especially in sub-clinically infected individuals. Consequently, it is plausible for a recently infected individual to yield a false negative result within only a few months after exposure. Immunodiagnostic attention has therefore shifted to studies of specific T cell memory to SARS-CoV-2. Most reports published so far agree that a T cell response is engaged during SARS-CoV-2 infection, but they also state that in 20-81% of SARS-CoV-2-unexposed individuals, T cells respond to SARS-CoV-2 antigens (mega peptide pools), allegedly due to T cell cross-reactivity with Common Cold coronaviruses (CCC), or other antigens. Here we show that, by introducing irrelevant mega peptide pools as negative controls to account for chance cross-reactivity, and by establishing the antigen dose-response characteristic of the T cells, one can clearly discern between cognate T cell memory induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection vs. cross-reactive T cell responses in individuals who have not been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Keywords: COVID-19; ELISPOT; ImmunoSpot; T cell affinity; immune monitoring; mega peptide pools.
Copyright © 2021 Lehmann, Kirchenbaum, Zhang, Reche and Lehmann.
Conflict of interest statement
PL is Founder, President and CEO of Cellular Technology Ltd., a company that specializes in immune monitoring by ELISPOT testing, producing high-throughput-suitable readers, test kits, and GLP-compliant contract research. AAL, GK, and TZ are employees of CTL. This study was funded by CTL, and the funder directed the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, and made the decision to submit it for publication.
Figures

Similar articles
-
SARS-CoV-2 specific memory T cell epitopes identified in COVID-19-recovered subjects.Virus Res. 2021 Oct 15;304:198508. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2021.198508. Epub 2021 Jul 27. Virus Res. 2021. PMID: 34329696 Free PMC article.
-
Potential Cross-Reactive Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 From Common Human Pathogens and Vaccines.Front Immunol. 2020 Oct 16;11:586984. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.586984. eCollection 2020. Front Immunol. 2020. PMID: 33178220 Free PMC article.
-
CD8+ T cells specific for an immunodominant SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid epitope cross-react with selective seasonal coronaviruses.Immunity. 2021 May 11;54(5):1055-1065.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 13. Immunity. 2021. PMID: 33945786 Free PMC article.
-
Immunologic Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection from the Antigen Perspective.J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5):e02160-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02160-20. Print 2021 Apr 20. J Clin Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 33318065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The T cell immune response against SARS-CoV-2.Nat Immunol. 2022 Feb;23(2):186-193. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01122-w. Epub 2022 Feb 1. Nat Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35105982 Review.
Cited by
-
Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses After a 3-dose Course of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study.Transplant Direct. 2022 Oct 7;8(11):e1389. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001389. eCollection 2022 Nov. Transplant Direct. 2022. PMID: 36245998 Free PMC article.
-
A Complementary Union of SARS-CoV2 Natural and Vaccine Induced Immune Responses.Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 13;13:914167. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.914167. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35911696 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lack of memory recall in human CD4 T cells elicited by the first encounter with SARS-CoV-2.iScience. 2024 May 17;27(6):109992. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109992. eCollection 2024 Jun 21. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38868209 Free PMC article.
-
Biotechnological Perspectives to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Precise Diagnostics and Inevitable Vaccine Paradigms.Cells. 2022 Mar 31;11(7):1182. doi: 10.3390/cells11071182. Cells. 2022. PMID: 35406746 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Discordance Between the Predicted Versus the Actually Recognized CD8+ T Cell Epitopes of HCMV pp65 Antigen and Aleatory Epitope Dominance.Front Immunol. 2021 Feb 9;11:618428. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.618428. eCollection 2020. Front Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33633736 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous