Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb;15(1):95-102.
doi: 10.1007/s12265-021-10144-6. Epub 2021 Jun 14.

A Less than Provocative Approach for the Primary Prevention of CAD

Affiliations
Review

A Less than Provocative Approach for the Primary Prevention of CAD

Robert Roberts et al. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) risk increases in proportion to the magnitude and duration of exposure to plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), doubling every additional decade of exposure. Early primary prevention is three times more effective than initiated later. Several clinical trials show plasma LDL-C of 15-40 mg/dL is more effective and equally safe as the Current Cardiovascular Clinical Practice Guidelines (CCCPG) recommended target of 70mg/dL. The cholesterol in the blood is the excess synthesized by the cells and secreted into the blood for disposal in the liver. The CCCPG is inadequate since traditional risk factors (TRF) are not detectable until the sixth and seventh decade. The genetic risk score (GRS) evaluated in 1 million individuals as a risk stratifier for CAD is superior to TRF. Genetic risk for CAD was reduced by 30-50% by statin therapy, PCSK9 inhibitors, and lifestyle changes. The GRS does not change during one's lifetime and is inexpensive. Incorporating genetic risk stratification into CCCPG would induce a paradigm shift in the primary prevention of CAD.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease; Genetic risk score; Genetics; Plasma cholesterol; Primary prevention; Traditional risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murray, C. J., & Lopez, A. D. (2013). Measuring the global burden of disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 369(5), 448–457. - PubMed
    1. Benjamin, E. J., Virani, S. S., Callaway, C. W., Chamberlain, A. M., Chang, A. R., Cheng, S., et al. (2018). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 137(12), e67–e492.
    1. Grundy, S. M., Stone, N. J., Bailey, A. L., Craig, B., Birtcher Kim, K., Blumenthal Roger, S., et al. (2019). 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 139(25), e1082–e1143. - PubMed
    1. Authors/Task Force Members. (2019). ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), ESC National Cardiac Societies. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Atherosclerosis, 290, 140–205.
    1. Borén, J., Chapman, M. J., Krauss, R. M., Packard, C. J., Bentzon, J. F., Binder, C. J., et al. (2020). Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. European Heart Journal, 41(24), 2313–2330. - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources