Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 34128498
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002211
Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Acute Displaced Distal Clavicle Fractures: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the differences in patient outcomes after operative or nonoperative treatment of displaced, type II distal clavicle fractures.
Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Level I trauma centers.
Patients/participants: Patients with completely displaced type II distal clavicle fractures were included. Fifty-seven patients were randomized: 27 to the operative group and 30 to the nonoperative group.
Intervention: Patients randomized to nonoperative care received a standard shoulder sling, followed by pendulum or gentle range of motion shoulder exercises at any time as directed by the attending surgeon. Patients randomized to the operative group received plate fixation with a precontoured distal clavicular plate or a "hook" plate within 28 days from injury.
Main outcome measure: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores at 1 year.
Results: There were no between-group differences in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand or Constant scores at 1 year. More patients in the operative group went on to union (95% vs. 64%, P = 0.02) within 1 year. Twelve patients in the operative group underwent a second operation for implant removal (12/27, 44%). In the nonoperative group, 6 patients (6/30, 20%) subsequently underwent 8 operative procedures.
Conclusion: Although this study failed to demonstrate a difference in functional outcomes between operative and nonoperative treatment of Neer type II distal clavicle fractures, nonoperative management led to more complications including a moderate rate of nonunion, which often required secondary surgery to correct, a higher rate of early dissatisfaction with shoulder appearance, and a delayed return to activities in the first 6 months. Operative management provided a safe and reliable treatment option with few complications, but often required secondary implant removal, especially with hook plate fixation.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
M. D. McKee and E. H. Schemitsch are consultants and receive royalties from Stryker for design of clavicle plates. The remaining authors report no conflict of interest.
Comment in
-
In Patients with Displaced Type-II Distal Clavicle Fractures, Operative and Nonoperative Therapies Did Not Differ for Functional Outcomes at 1 Year.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Aug 17;104(16):1503. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00484. Epub 2022 Jun 2. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022. PMID: 35700086 No abstract available.
References
-
- Banerjee R, Waterman B, Padalecki J, et al. Management of distal clavicle fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:392–401.
-
- Oh JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, et al. Treatment of distal clavicle fracture: a systematic review of treatment modalities in 425 fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:525–533.
-
- Kihlström C, Möller M, Löhn K, et al. Clavicle fractures: epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2 422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:82.
-
- Neer CS. Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:43–50.
-
- Fox H, Ramsey DC, Thompson AR, et al. Neer type-II distal clavicle fractures: a cost effectiveness analysis of fixation techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102:254–261.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials