Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;39(3):322-331.
doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1935048. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Personal responsibility for health? A phenomenographic analysis of general practitioners' conceptions

Joar Björk  1   2 , Terese Stenfors  3 , Niklas Juth  1 , A Birgitta Gunnarsson  2   4
Affiliations

Personal responsibility for health? A phenomenographic analysis of general practitioners' conceptions

Joar Björk et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To analyse and describe general practitioners' perceptions of the notion of a 'personal responsibility for health'.

Design: Interview study, phenomenographic analysis.

Setting: Swedish primary health care.

Subjects: General Practitioners (GPs).

Main outcome measures: Using the phenomenographic method, the different views of the phenomenon (here: personal responsibility for health) were presented in an outcome space to illustrate the range of perceptions.

Results: The participants found the notion of personal responsibility for health relevant to their practice. There was a wide range of perceptions regarding the origins of this responsibility, which was seen as coming from within yourself; from your relationships to specific others; and/or from your relationship with the generalized other. Furthermore, the expressions of this responsibility were perceived as including owning your health problem; not offloading all responsibility onto the GP; taking active measures to keep and improve health; and/or accepting help in health. The GP was described as playing a key role in shaping and defining the patient's responsibility for his/her health. Some aspects of personal responsibility for health roused strong emotions in the participants, especially situations where the patient was seen as offloading all responsibility onto the GP.

Conclusion: The notion of personal responsibility for health is relevant to GPs. However, it is open to a broad range of interpretations and modulated by the patient-physician interaction. This may make it unsuitable for usage in health care priority settings. More research is mandated to further investigate how physicians work with patient responsibility, and how this affects the patient-physician relationship and the physician's own well-being.Key PointsThe notion of personal responsibility for health has relevance for discussions about priority setting and person-centred care.This study, using a phenomenographic approach, investigated the views of Swedish GPs about the notion of personal responsibility for health.The participants found the notion relevant to their practice. They expressed a broad range of views of what a personal responsibility for health entails and how it arises. The GP was described as playing a key role in shaping and defining the patient's responsibilities for his/her health.The notion was emotionally charged to the participants, and when patients were seen as offloading all responsibility onto the GP this gave rise to frustration.

Keywords: Attitudes of health personnel; general practitioners; health priorities; phenomenography; qualitative research; responsibility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Outcome space – participants’ understanding of a ‘personal responsibility for health’.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bognar G, Hirose I.. The ethics of health care rationing: an introduction. Abingdon: Routledge; 2014.
    1. Socialdepartementet . Vårdens svåra val: Slutbetänkande av prioriteringstredningen. [Health care’s difficult choices]. Stockholm: Fritzes; 1995.
    1. Arvidsson E, André M, Borgquist L, et al. . Priority setting in primary health care – dilemmas and opportunities: a focus group study . BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjork J, Lynoe N, Juth N.. Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. PrioriteringsCentrum Linköping . Vårdens alltför svåra val? Kartläggning av prioriteringsarbete och analys av riksdagens principer och riktlinjer för prioriteringar i hälso- och sjukvården [Health care’s all to difficult choices?]. Linköping: PrioriteringsCentrum, Landstinget i Östergötland; 2007.

LinkOut - more resources