Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;46(10):4946-4966.
doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03171-z. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture

Affiliations
Review

Imaging evaluation of uterine perforation and rupture

Hassan Aboughalia et al. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Uterine perforation and rupture, denoting iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic uterine wall injury, respectively, are associated with substantial morbidity,and at times mortality. Diverse conditions can result in injury to both the gravid and the non-gravid uterus, and imaging plays a central role in diagnosis of such suspected cases. Ultrasound (US) is the initial imaging modality of choice, depicting the secondary signs associated with uterine wall injury and occasionally revealing the site of perforation. Computed tomography can be selectively used to complement US findings, to provide a more comprehensive picture, and to investigate complications beyond the reach of US, such as bowel injury. In certain scenarios, magnetic resonance imaging can be an important problem-solving tool as well. Finally, catheter angiography is a valuable tool with both diagnostic and therapeutic capability, with potential for fertility preservation. In this manuscript, we will highlight the clinical and imaging approach to uterine perforation and rupture, while emphasizing the value of various imaging modalities in this context. In addition, we will review the multi-modality imaging features of uterine perforation and rupture and will address the role of the radiologist as a crucial member of the management team. Finally, a summary diagrammatic depiction of imaging approach to patients presenting with uterine perforation or rupture is provided.

Keywords: Pelvic imaging; Uterine perforation; Uterine rupture.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vikhareva Osser O, Valentin L (2011) Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 117:525–532 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Heemskerk SG, Ten Eikelder MLG, Janssen CAH (2019) Uterine rupture in pregnancy after an intervention complicated by uterine perforation: Case report and systematic review of literature. Sex Reprod Healthc 19:9–14 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Shakir F, Diab Y (2013) The perforated uterus. Obstet Gynaecol 15:256–261
    1. Seol HJ, Ki KD (2015) Rupture of uterine serosal hematoma: delayed complication of uterine perforation. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 42:388–9 - PubMed
    1. Shulman SG, Bell CL, Hampf FE (2006) Uterine perforation and small bowel incarceration: sonographic and surgical findings. Emerg Radiol 13:43–5 - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources