Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May;36(5):2954-2961.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08589-6. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

PuraStat in gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a prospective multicentre observational pilot study

Affiliations
Observational Study

PuraStat in gastrointestinal bleeding: results of a prospective multicentre observational pilot study

Federica Branchi et al. Surg Endosc. 2022 May.

Abstract

Background: A recently developed haemostatic peptide gel for endoscopic application has been introduced to improve the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy and indication profiles of PuraStat in a clinical setting.

Methods: In this prospective observational multicentre pilot study, patients with acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding (upper and lower) were included. Primary and secondary application of PuraStat was evaluated. Haemoglobin, prothrombin time, platelets and transfusion behaviour were documented before and after haemostasis. The efficacy of PuraStat was assessed during the procedure, at 3 days and 1 week after application.

Results: 111 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding were recruited into the study. 70 percent (78/111) of the patients had upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 30% (33/111) had lower gastrointestinal bleeding. After primary application of PuraStat, initial haemostatic success was achieved in 94% of patients (74/79, 95% CI 88-99%), and in 75% of the patients when used as a secondary haemostatic product, following failure of established techniques (24/32, 95% CI 59-91%). The therapeutic success rates (absence of rebleeding) after 3 and 7 days were 91% and 87% after primary use, and 87% and 81% in all study patients. Overall rebleeding rate at 30 day follow-up was 16% (18/111). In the 5 patients who finally required surgery (4.5%), PuraStat allowed temporary haemostasis and stabilisation.

Conclusions: PuraStat expanded the therapeutic toolbox available for an effective treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding sources. It could be safely applied and administered without complications as a primary or secondary therapy. PuraStat may additionally serve as a bridge to surgery in order to achieve temporary haemostasis in case of refractory severe bleeding, possibly playing a role in preventing immediate emergency surgery.

Keywords: Gastrointestinal bleeding; Haemostasis; PuraStat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kristina Friedrich and Drs. Branchi, Klingenberg-Noftz, Bürgel, Daum, Buchkremer, Sonnenberg, Schumann, Treese, Tröger, Lissner, Epple, Stroux, Adler, Veltzke-Schlieker, Autenrieth, Leonhardt, Fischer, Jürgensen, Pape, Möschler, Schreiner, Hempel, Huber and Bojarski as well as Prof. Siegmund, Prof. Wiedenmann and Prof. Strowski have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose. None of the authors has financial relationships with any pharmaceutical or device company.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A: PuraStat system ready-to-use. A 5 mL PuraStat syringe is connected with the application catheter (Image by courtesy of 3D Matrix UK, Ltd, London, UK)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Clinical application of PuraStat in different indications. A Duodenal ulcer with vessel and adherent clot. B Gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the proximal jejunum after oozing haemorrhage. C Duodenal ulcer with visible vessel, stabilisation of the endoscope with distal cap. D Oozing bleeding after polypectomy in the duodenum. E Tumour bleeding after duodenal infiltration of a pancreas tumour. F Duodenal ulcer with vessel and adherent clot

References

    1. Farthing M, Roberts SE, Samuel DG, et al. Survey of digestive health across Europe: Final report. Part 1: the burden of gastrointestinal diseases and the organisation and delivery of gastroenterology services across Europe. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2014;2:539–543. doi: 10.1177/2050640614554154. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 2011;60:1327–1335. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228437. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tielleman T, Bujanda D, Cryer B. Epidemiology and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015;25:415–428. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2015.02.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitali F, Naegel A, Atreya R, et al. Comparison of Hemospray((R)) and Endoclot() for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25:1592–1602. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1592. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Facciorusso A, Straus Takahashi M, Eyileten Postula C, et al. Efficacy of hemostatic powders in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51:1633. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.07.001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources