A COMPARISON OF A SINGLE-DART VERSUS STAGED TWO-DART ANESTHESIA INDUCTION PROTOCOL IN PRZEWALSKI'S HORSES (EQUUS FERUS PRZEWALSKII)
- PMID: 34130387
- DOI: 10.1638/2020-0133
A COMPARISON OF A SINGLE-DART VERSUS STAGED TWO-DART ANESTHESIA INDUCTION PROTOCOL IN PRZEWALSKI'S HORSES (EQUUS FERUS PRZEWALSKII)
Abstract
Przewalski's horses (Equus ferus przewalskii) are an endangered equid species. Anesthesia administered by remote delivery is often needed to provide medical care. Behavioral and physiologic parameters were prospectively compared in 14 horses (8 females and 6 males, 3-18 yr) after a single-dart or staged two-dart anesthesia induction protocol with intramuscular medetomidine (0.06 mg/kg), butorphanol (0.05 mg/kg), thiafentanil (0.02 mg/kg), and ketamine (1 mg/kg). Seven horses were randomly assigned to receive all drugs in a single dart, and the other seven to receive medetomidine and butorphanol 10 min prior to thiafentanil and ketamine in a second dart. Induction and recovery quality were scored on a scale from 1 to 5 (worst to best), and video recordings were assessed for frequency of specific behaviors. Need for supplemental propofol was recorded. Median induction score was significantly better (P = 0.01) after two darts (4/5) compared to a single dart (3/5). Degree of muscle fasciculation (undesirable) during induction was significantly lower (P= 0.006) with the two-dart protocol. During the transition to recumbency, 71% versus 14% of horses transitioned headfirst (undesirable) after a single dart versus two darts, respectively (P= 0.07). Supplemental propofol administration was necessary in 43% of horses after two darts and in 100% of horses after a single dart (P= 0.10) to facilitate intubation and reach a working depth of anesthesia. Physiologic and recovery parameters were not significantly different between groups. Improved induction quality was observed clinically using a staged two-dart versus a single-dart protocol and should be considered when anesthetizing captive Przewalski's horses using this drug combination.
References
-
- Bouts T, Dodds J, Berry K, Arif A, Taylor P, Routh A, Gasthuys F. Detomidine and butorphanol for standing sedation in a range of zoo-kept ungulate species. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2017;48(3):616–626.
-
- Citino S, Bush M, Grobler D, Lance W. Anesthesia of boma-captured Lichtenstein's Hartebeest (Sigmoceros lichtensteinii) with a combination of thiafentanil, medetomidine, and ketamine. J Wildl Dis. 2002;38(2):457–462.
-
- Herr J, Rasmussen J, Vodicka R, Thompson R, Wolf T. Quality of anesthesia induced by thiafentanil combinations in zoo-managed and free-ranging Equus caballus przewalskii. In: Proc EAZWV/AAZV; 2018. p. 219.
-
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species. Equus ferus przewalskii. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T7961A45172099.en
-
- Khanna AK, McDonell WN, Dyson DH, Taylor PM. Cardiopulmonary effect of hypercapnia during controlled intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the horse. Can J Vet Res. 1995;59(3):213–221.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources