Current concepts of spondylosis and posterior spinal motion preservation for radiologists
- PMID: 34131792
- DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03840-6
Current concepts of spondylosis and posterior spinal motion preservation for radiologists
Abstract
Spinal fusion is performed to eliminate motion at a degenerated or unstable segment. However, this is associated with loss of motion at the fused levels and increased stress on adjacent levels. Motion-preserving implants have been designed in effort to mitigate the limitations of fusion. This review will focus on posterior spinal motion-preserving technologies. In the cervical spine, laminoplasty is a posterior motion-preserving procedure used in the management of myelopathy/cord compression. In the lumbar spine, motion-sparing systems include interspinous process devices (also referred to as interspinous process spacers or distraction devices), posterior dynamic stabilization devices (also referred to as pedicle screw/rod fixation-based systems), and posterior element replacement systems (also referred to as total facet replacement devices). Knowledge of the intended physiologic purpose, hardware utilized, and complications is important in the assessment of imaging in those who have undergone posterior motion preservation procedures.
Keywords: Fusion; Interspinous process device; Laminoplasty; Posterior dynamic stabilization device; Posterior element replacement system; Spondylosis.
© 2021. ISS.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Dec;27(6):643-649. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.SPINE161169. Epub 2017 Sep 22. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 28937328
-
Comparison of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization and fusion surgery in the treatment of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration: a retrospective analysis of single L5-S1 degenerative spondylosis covering 4 years.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):706-712. doi: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE1679. Epub 2016 Jun 24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27341057
-
Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2342-2350. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06856-7. Epub 2021 May 4. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 33948750
-
Motion preservation surgery in the spine.Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014 May;24(2):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2014.01.008. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014. PMID: 24792608 Review.
-
Preservation of Motion in Spine Surgery.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr 1;31(7):e356-e365. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00956. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 36877764 Review.
Cited by
-
One- and 2-year outcomes of lumbar facet arthroplasty versus spinal fusion in young (<65 years) and old (≥65 years) patients for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis and stenosis.N Am Spine Soc J. 2024 May 16;19:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100329. eCollection 2024 Sep. N Am Spine Soc J. 2024. PMID: 38989291 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tyagi V, Strom R, Tanweer O, Frempong-Boadu AK. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine review of biomechanical and clinical studies. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;2018(76):100–4.
-
- Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:629698.
-
- Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(15):1701–7. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources