Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;54(1):216-232.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01602-9. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

Building an intelligent recommendation system for personalized test scheduling in computerized assessments: A reinforcement learning approach

Affiliations

Building an intelligent recommendation system for personalized test scheduling in computerized assessments: A reinforcement learning approach

Jinnie Shin et al. Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

The introduction of computerized formative assessments in the classroom has opened a new area of effective progress monitoring with more accessible test administrations. With computerized formative assessments, all students could be tested at the same time and with the same number of test administrations within a school year. Alternatively, the decision for the number and frequency of such tests could be made by teachers based on their observations and personal judgments about students. However, this often results in rigid test scheduling that fails to take into account the pace at which students acquire knowledge. To administer computerized formative assessments efficiently, teachers should be provided with systematic guidance regarding effective test scheduling based on each student's level of progress. In this study, we introduce an intelligent recommendation system that can gauge the optimal number and timing of testing for each student. We discuss how to build an intelligent recommendation system using a reinforcement learning approach. Then, we present a case study with a large sample of students' test results in a computerized formative assessment. We show that the intelligent recommendation system can significantly reduce the number of testing for the students by eliminating unnecessary test administrations where students do not show significant progress (i.e., growth). Also, the proposed recommendation system is capable of identifying the optimal test time for students to demonstrate adequate progress from one test administration to another. Implications for future research on personalized assessment scheduling are discussed.

Keywords: Computerized formative assessment; Personalized learning; Reinforcement learning; Test administration optimization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. In Frontiers in Education, (Vol. 4 p. 87): Frontiers.
    1. Angus, S. D., & Watson, J. (2009). Does regular online testing enhance student learning in the numerical sciences? robust evidence from a large data set. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 255–272.
    1. Bellman, R. (1954). The theory of dynamic programming. Technical Report. Rand Corp Santa Monica CA.
    1. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.
    1. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2001). Feedback in questioning and marking: The science teacher’s role in formative assessment. School Science Review, 82(301), 55–61.

LinkOut - more resources