Crown-rump length measurement: a new age for first-trimester ultrasound?
- PMID: 34131973
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23692
Crown-rump length measurement: a new age for first-trimester ultrasound?
Comment on
-
Crown-rump length measurement error: impact on assessment of growth.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;58(3):354-359. doi: 10.1002/uog.23690. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33998101
References
REFERENCES
-
- Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 298-312.
-
- Gadsbøll K, Wright A, Kristensen S, Verfaille V, Nicolaides K, Wright D, Petersen OB. Crown-rump length measurement error: impact on assessment of growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58: 354-359.
-
- Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. BJOG 2014; 121: 556-565.
-
- Robinson HP, Fleming JE. A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702-710.
-
- Økland I, Bjåstad TG, Johansen TF, Gjessing HK, Grøttum P, Eik-Nes SH. Narrowed beam width in newer ultrasound machines shortens measurements in the lateral direction: fetal measurement charts may be obsolete. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 82-87.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
