Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;59(1):53.
doi: 10.3892/ijo.2021.5233. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review)

Affiliations
Review

A multidisciplinary approach remains the best strategy to improve and strengthen the management of ovarian cancer (Review)

Luca Falzone et al. Int J Oncol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Ovarian cancer represents one of the most aggressive female tumors worldwide. Over the decades, the therapeutic options for the treatment of ovarian cancer have been improved significantly through the advancement of surgical techniques as well as the availability of novel effective drugs able to extend the life expectancy of patients. However, due to its clinical, biological and molecular complexity, ovarian cancer is still considered one of the most difficult tumors to manage. In this context, several studies have highlighted how a multidisciplinary approach to this pathology improves the prognosis and survival of patients with ovarian cancer. On these bases, the aim of the present review is to present recent advantages in the diagnosis, staging and treatment of ovarian cancer highlighting the benefits of a patient‑centered care approach and on the importance of a multidisciplinary team for the management of ovarian cancer.

Keywords: diagnosis; multidisciplinary approach; multidisciplinary team; ovarian cancer; patient‑centered care; poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase inhibitors; staging; therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the pharmacological treatments for the management of ovarian cancer. First-line treatments based on the administration of platinum/taxane regimen plus anti-VEGF mAb bevacizumab. Second-line treatments based on the administration of paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine in the case of platinum sensitive tumors or bevacizumab plus paclitaxel, gemcitabine, doxorubicin or topotecan in the case of platinum resistant tumors. For BRCA mutated ovarian cancer, PARP inhibitors can be used for first-line or second-line treatments. Third-line treatments consist in the administration of the first-line and second-line drugs plus immune checkpoint inhibitors. MHC, major histocompatibility complex; RNR, ribonucleotide reductase; TCR, T-cell receptor; TOP1, type 1 topoisomerase; TOP2, type 2 topoisomerase.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear management of ovarian cancer. Main players of ovarian cancer management are the surgeon who removes the tumor, the pathologist who assesses the tumor histotype and the medical oncologist who selects and starts the pharmacological treatments. There is no interaction between these three main specialists in the management of the patient with ovarian cancer.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Circular approach to the management of patients with ovarian cancer patients. Main specialists involved in ovarian cancer care interact with each other sharing all of the relevant information and all clinical decisions are patient-centered.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Circular and multidisciplinary network for the management of patients with ovarian cancer. The gynecological surgeon, pathologist and oncologist are the key nodes of the patient-centered circular multidisciplinary network. Other specialists, including nurses, geneticists, nutritionists, radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians, radiotherapists, general practitioners, vascular surgeons, urologists, gynecologists, general surgeons and psycho-oncologists, actively participate in all the decision-making steps of ovarian cancer management.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falzone L, Salomone S, Libra M. Evolution of cancer pharmacological treatments at the turn of the third millennium. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1300. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01300. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Samimi G, Runowicz CD, Gaudet MM, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:284–296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reid BM, Permuth JB, Sellers TA. Epidemiology of ovarian cancer: A review. Cancer Biol Med. 2017;14:9–32. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shafrir AL, Rice MS, Gupta M, Terry KL, Rosner BA, Tamimi RM, Hecht JL, Tworoger SS. The association between reproductive and hormonal factors and ovarian cancer by estrogen-α and progesterone receptor status. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;143:628–635. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.09.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed