Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113769.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13769.

Comparison of Program-centric vs Student-centric National Resident Matching Algorithms

Briance Mascarenhas  1 , Kartikeya S Puranam  1 , Michael N Katehakis  2
Affiliations

Comparison of Program-centric vs Student-centric National Resident Matching Algorithms

Briance Mascarenhas et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: The current program-centric algorithm for the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) primarily uses the program's ranking of students to determine a match. Concerns that the existing algorithm favors programs over students, recent findings that the program's ranking of applicants is not associated with resident performance, and disruptions of existing screening methods and metrics have prompted reevaluation of the current algorithm relative to a student-centric algorithm, in which student ranking of programs is primary and program ranking of students is secondary.

Objective: To compare program-centric and student-centric algorithms for the NRMP participants.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used randomized computer-generated data reflecting the NRMP match for 2018, 2019, and 2020, capturing more than 50 000 students and more than 4000 programs in 23 specialties, to compare the 2 algorithms.

Exposures: The same simulated students, programs, and rankings were exposed to the 2 algorithms, running 2300 simulations in the overall analysis and 1000 simulations in each of 23 specialties.

Main outcomes and measures: The percentage of students who did and did not match, the percentage of students who matched to their top-ranked and top-5-ranked programs, and the program's rank of the last student matched per position were examined.

Results: The 2 algorithms were not different in percentage of students matched overall (eg, for 2020, program-centric: 59% [95% CI, 57%-61%]; student-centric: 58% [95% CI, 56%-60%]; P = .73). The student-centric algorithm, relative to the program-centric algorithm, matched a significantly higher percentage of students to their first-ranked program (eg, for 2020, 50% [95% CI, 48%-52%] vs 14% [95% CI, 13%-15%]; P < .001) and to their top-5-ranked programs (eg, for 2020, 60% [95% CI, 58%-62%] vs 46% [95% CI, 44%-48%]; P < .001). However, the last position was filled with students who had lower program rankings in the student-centric algorithm vs the program-centric algorithm (2 [95% CI, 1-2] vs 8 [95% CI, 6-10]; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the 2 algorithms were not different in the percentage of students matched overall. However, the student-centric algorithm matched a significantly higher percentage of students to their preferred programs. The program-centric algorithm was associated with a lower program's last matched student rank. Further research is needed on the algorithms' associations with cost and time demands in the match, postmatch resident and program performance, and fit with a changing environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Algorithm Flowcharts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gliatto P, Karani R. Viewpoint from 2 undergraduate medical education deans: the residency application process: working well, needs fixing, or broken beyond repair? J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(3):307-310. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-16-00230.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sullivan GM. Repairing the residency application process. J Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(3):306-306. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-16-00229.1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carek PJ, Anderson KD. msJAMA: residency selection process and the match: does anyone believe anybody? JAMA. 2001;285(21):2784-2785. doi:10.1001/jama.285.21.2784-JMS0606-5-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson KD, Jacobs DM. General surgery program directors’ perceptions of the match. Curr Surg. 2000;57(5):460-465. doi:10.1016/S0149-7944(00)00309-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams KJ; National Resident Matching Program . A reexamination of the NRMP matching algorithm. Acad Med. 1995;70(6):470-476. doi:10.1097/00001888-199506000-00007 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms