Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions
- PMID: 34133594
- PMCID: PMC8288543
- DOI: 10.36660/abc.20190653
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions
Abstract
Background: The advent of drug-eluting stents allowed the percutaneous coronary intervention to present safe results in lesions in the left main coronary artery.
Objectives: To analyze the results of the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery lesion with the use of intravascular ultrasound.
Methods: Study of consecutive case series carried out from January 2010 to December 2018. Clinical data were collected from patients as well as prognostic scores and data on coronary lesion. Low-grade residual lesion (less than 50%) on angiography and minimum luminal area greater than 6 mm2on intravascular ultrasound were considered successful. The adopted significance level was 5%.
Results: 107 cases were analyzed. The multivessel lesion was predominant, with most (39.25%) of the lesions being found in three vessels in addition to the left main coronary artery. The SYNTAX score had a mean of 46.80 (SD: 22.95), and 70 (65.42%) patients had a SYNTAX score above 32 points. Angiographic success of percutaneous intervention was considered in 106 (99.06%) patients. The overall rate of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events in the hospital outcome was 6.54%, being similar in patients with SYNTAX score ≤ 32 (8.10%) and ≥ 33 (5.71%; p = 0.68).
Conclusions: Percutaneous intervention in cases of unprotected left main coronary artery lesion was safely performed and presented excellent results. Considerable angiographic success of treatment guided by intravascular ultrasound was achieved. The rate of major cardiac and cerebrovascular events was similar between patients at low and high risks.
Fundamento: O advento dos stents farmacológicos permitiu que a intervenção coronariana percutânea apresentasse resultados seguros nas lesões de tronco da artéria coronária esquerda.
Objetivos: Analisar os resultados do tratamento percutâneo da lesão não protegida de tronco da artéria coronária com a utilização de ultrassom intravascular.
Métodos: Estudo de série de casos consecutivos realizado no período de janeiro de 2010 a dezembro de 2018. Coletaram-se dados clínicos dos pacientes, assim como escores prognósticos e dados da lesão coronariana. Considerou-se de sucesso a lesão residual menor que 50% à angiografia e a área mínima da luz maior que 6 mm 2 ao ultrassom intravascular. O nível de significância adotado foi de 5%.
Resultados: Analisaram-se 107 casos. A lesão multiarterial foi predominante, sendo com maior frequência (39,25%) encontradas lesões em três vasos além do tronco coronariano. O escore SYNTAX apresentou média de 46,80 (DP: 22,95), e 70 (65,42%) pacientes tiveram escore SYNTAX acima de 32 pontos. Considerou-se sucesso angiográfico da intervenção percutânea em 106 (99,06%) pacientes. A taxa geral de evento maior cardíaco e cerebrovascular no desfecho hospitalar foi 6,54%, sendo semelhante nos pacientes com escore SYNTAX ≤ 32 (8,10%) e ≥ 33 (5,71%; p = 0,68) .
Conclusões: A intervenção percutânea em casos de lesão não protegida de tronco coronariano foi realizada com segurança e apresentou ótimos resultados. Atingiu-se alto sucesso angiográfico de tratamento guiado pelo ultrassom intravascular. A taxa de eventos cardíacos e cerebrovasculares maiores foi semelhante entre os pacientes de menor e de maior risco.
Conflict of interest statement
Potencial conflito de interesse
Não há conflito com o presente artigo
Comment in
-
Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Intervention. Why are Real-World Data so Important?Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021 Jun;116(6):1109-1110. doi: 10.36660/abc.20210236. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34133595 Free PMC article. English, Portuguese. No abstract available.
References
-
- 1. Athappan G, Chacko P, Patvardhan E, Gajulapalli RD, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. Late stroke: comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel disease and unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis and review of literature. Stroke. 2014;45(1):185-93. - PubMed
-
- 2. Ahn JM, Roh JH, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee PH, et al. Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(20):2198-206. - PubMed
-
- 3. Mohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):629-38. - PubMed
-
- 4. Gagnor A, Tomassini F, Romagnoli E, Montali N, Giolitto S, Tizzani E, et al. Primary angioplasty in ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to unprotected left-main coronary disease in a high-volume catheterization center without on-site surgery facilities: immediate and medium-term outcome: the STEMI-Placet Registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(12):645-9. - PubMed
-
- 5. Lucisano L, Calcagno S, Pennacchi M, Stio RE, Mancone M, Sardella G. Results of the self-expandable BA9 stent for treatment of large angle coronary bifurcation. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2014;62(1):19-27. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical