Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun 16;9(1):49.
doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00301-z.

Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: rationale, practice and perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: rationale, practice and perspectives

Wenyu Cao et al. Biomark Res. .

Abstract

Tumor immunotherapy has attracted more and more attention nowadays, and multiple clinical trials have confirmed its effect in a variety of solid tumors. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and lymphocyte-promoting cytokines are the main immunotherapy methods. Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most frequent tumors in women and the prognosis of recurrent or metastatic EC is poor. Since molecular classification has been applied to EC, immunotherapy for different EC subtypes (especially POLE and MSI-H) has gradually attracted attention. In this review, we focus on the expression and molecular basis of the main biomarkers in the immunotherapy of EC firstly, as well as their clinical application significance and limitations. Blocking tumor immune checkpoints is one of the most effective strategies for cancer treatment in recent years, and has now become the focus in the field of tumor research and treatment. We summarized clinical date of planned and ongoing clinical trials and introduced other common immunotherapy methods in EC, such as cancer vaccine and ACT. Hormone aberrations, metabolic syndrome (MetS) and p53 mutant and that affect the immunotherapy of endometrial cancer will also be discussed in this review.

Keywords: ACT, MetS, p53 mutant; Biomarkers; Endometrial cancer; Hormone aberrations; Immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs); Immunotherapy; Vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Morice P, Leary A, Creutzberg C, Abu-Rustum N, Darai E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1094–1108. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00130-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lortet-Tieulent J, Ferlay J, Bray F, Jemal A. International Patterns and Trends in Endometrial Cancer Incidence, 1978-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(4):354–361. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarke M, Devesa S, Harvey S, Wentzensen N. Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(22):1895–1908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connor E, Rose P. Management Strategies for Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(9):873–885. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1491311. - DOI - PubMed