Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique in Managing Native and Periprosthetic Acetabular Insufficiency
- PMID: 34136608
- PMCID: PMC8180963
- DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.04.014
Staged Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique in Managing Native and Periprosthetic Acetabular Insufficiency
Abstract
Background: There is no consensus on how to best address acetabular insufficiency. Several described techniques have a high rate of loosening and most rely on fixation to intact innominate bones. They also require extensive exposure and expensive implants. We present a novel technique for acetabular insufficiency management including discontinuity and a series with mean 6.5-year follow-up.
Material and methods: After exposure, a femoral neck osteotomy is made, or the femoral component is removed. Bone graft is reverse reamed into the defect, and a porous coated acetabular shell is implanted with screws for supplemental fixation. In 3-6 months, after defect healing, the femoral component is implanted. All staged total hip arthroplasties for pelvic discontinuity from 2010 to 2015 by a single provider with minimum 5-year follow-up were identified. Implant survivorship, Merle d'Aubinge, and visual analog scale scores as well as complications were recorded.
Results: Nine patients were identified with mean 80.8-month follow-up (62-129). Merle D'Aubinge scores improved from 5.6 (4-8) to 15.3 (14-18), and Visual analog scale scores improved from 7.2 (6-9) to 0.8 (0-2). All implants were retained, and all patients were ambulatory at the terminal follow-up. There were 2 greater trochanter fractures, one calcar fracture managed with cerclage, and one patient developed heterotopic ossification.
Conclusion: Staged total hip arthroplasty can be used to address pelvic discontinuity with excellent short- to mid-term outcomes. This technique allows for a more limited exposure and the use of primary hip implants. Fixation is by ingrowth and does not rely on intact pelvic architecture.
Keywords: Acetabular fracture; Pelvic discontinuity; Protrusio; Revision hip arthroplasty; Staged hip arthroplasty.
© 2021 The Authors.
Figures






References
-
- Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780. - PubMed
-
- Ravi B., Croxford R., Reichmann W.M., Losina E., Katz J.N., Hawker G.A. The changing demographics of total joint arthroplasty recipients in the United States and Ontario from 2001 to 2007. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(5):637. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources