Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 7;6(1):116-134.
doi: 10.20411/pai.v6i1.441. eCollection 2021.

Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines Are Detectable in Saliva

Affiliations

Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines Are Detectable in Saliva

Thomas J Ketas et al. Pathog Immun. .

Abstract

The approved Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are well known to induce serum antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S)-protein. However, their abilities to elicit mucosal immune responses have not been reported. Saliva antibodies represent mucosal responses that may be relevant to how mRNA vaccines prevent oral and nasal SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, we describe the outcome of a cross-sectional study on a healthcare worker cohort (WELCOME-NYPH), in which we assessed whether IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies to the S-protein and its receptor-binding domain (RBD) were present in serum and saliva samples. Anti-S-protein IgG was detected in 14/31 and 66/66 of saliva samples from uninfected participants after vaccine doses-1 and -2, respectively. IgA antibodies to the S-protein were present in 40/66 saliva samples after dose 2. Anti-S-protein IgG was present in every serum sample from recipients of 2 vaccine doses. Vaccine-induced antibodies against the RBD were also frequently present in saliva and sera. These findings may help our understanding of whether and how vaccines may impede SARS-CoV-2 transmission, including to oral cavity target cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors declares a competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein in saliva and sera from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine recipients and infected people. Each diagram shows S-protein IgA, IgG, and IgM antibody reactivities over the time of sampling. The dates of vaccination are indicated by the variable bars. Representative single-dilution binding data are shown for sera from each category: (A) Pfizer vaccine: Cases 0010, 0044, 0046, 0061. (B) Moderna vaccine: Cases 0009, 0040, 0041, 0059. (C) Control (non-infected): Cases 0006, 0011, 0013. 0020. (D) Infected: Cases 0001, 0015, 0051, 0052. Additional profiles for groups 1-4 are shown in Supplemental Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein in saliva and sera from SARS-CoV-2 vaccine recipients. The data shown were collated for all vaccine recipients shown in Figure 1A, B and the corresponding panels of Supplemental Figure 1. The longitudinal profiles span a 150-day period before and then ~100 days after the first immunization (day-0, indicated by the vertical black stippled line). A) Saliva and B) serum IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodies against the S-protein; C) Saliva IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodies against the RBD (after vaccine dose 2 only). Recipients of the Moderna vaccine are represented in red, Pfizer in black.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Specificity and sensitivity of IgA detection. Purified human IgG, purified SigA, and recombinant, dimeric IgA1 lambda were coated onto ELISA plates and detected with the same goat anti-human IgA HRP conjugate used in the assays to detect saliva and serum IgA S-protein antibodies. The plot shows net OD450 values (+/− SEM) as a function of the logarithmic concentrations of the 3 antibodies added to the ELISA wells during the coating stage.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Antibody response to the common cold CoV S-proteins in saliva and sera from participant 0022. A) The format of this panel is the same as Figure 1 and shows data derived using the SARS-CoV-2 S-protein. B) The panels show saliva or serum IgA or IgG antibody responses to S-proteins from the endemic CoVs 229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43, in comparison to SARS-CoV-2, as indicated.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Relative antibody reactivities with S-protein in saliva and sera. A reference serum from a SARS-CoV-2 infected person (D56, not part of the NYP-WELCOME cohort; in blue) and serum (in red) and saliva (in black) samples from 2 recipients of 2 doses of the Pfizer vaccine (0003, day-29, top row; 0007, day-33, bottom row) were titrated under the conditions of the ELISA used to detect IgA and IgG in saliva. The displacement of the serum and saliva titration curves suggest that the S-protein IgA and IgG end-point titers in saliva are ~1000-fold and ~10,000-fold lower than in sera, respectively.

Update of

References

    1. Klasse PJ, Nixon DF, Moore JP. Immunogenicity of clinically relevant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in nonhuman primates and humans. Sci Adv. 2021;7(12). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe8065. PubMed PMID: ; PMCID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krammer F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature. 2020;586(7830):516–27. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2798-3. PubMed PMID: . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, Diemert D, Spector SA, Rouphael N, Creech CB, McGettigan J, Khetan S, Segall N, Solis J, Brosz A, Fierro C, Schwartz H, Neuzil K, Corey L, Gilbert P, Janes H, Follmann D, Marovich M, Mascola J, Polakowski L, Ledgerwood J, Graham BS, Bennett H, Pajon R, Knightly C, Leav B, Deng W, Zhou H, Han S, Ivarsson M, Miller J, Zaks T, Group CS. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(5):403–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. PubMed PMID: ; PMCID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Perez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Roychoudhury S, Koury K, Li P, Kalina WV, Cooper D, Frenck RW, Jr., Hammitt LL, Tureci O, Nell H, Schaefer A, Unal S, Tresnan DB, Mather S, Dormitzer PR, Sahin U, Jansen KU, Gruber WC, Group CCT. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2603–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. PubMed PMID: ; PMCID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang N, Perez P, Kato T, Mikami Y, Okuda K, Gilmore RC, Conde CD, Gasmi B, Stein S, Beach M, Pe-layo E, Maldonado JO, Lafont BA, Jang SI, Nasir N, Padilla RJ, Murrah VA, Maile R, Lovell W, Wallet SM, Bowman NM, Meinig SL, Wolfgang MC, Choudhury SN, Novotny M, Aevermann BD, Scheuermann RH, Cannon G, Anderson CW, Lee RE, Marchesan JT, Bush M, Freire M, Kimple AJ, Herr DL, Rabin J, Grazioli A, Das S, French BN, Pranzatelli T, Chiorini JA, Kleiner DE, Pittaluga S, Hewitt SM, Burbelo PD, Chertow D, Consortium NC-A, Oral HCA, Craniofacial Biological N, Frank K, Lee J, Boucher RC, Teichmann SA, Warner BM, Byrd KM. SARS-CoV-2 infection of the oral cavity and saliva. Nat Med. 2021;27(5):892–903. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01296-8. PubMed PMID: . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources