Predict success of shock wave lithotripsy was still interesting and challenging
- PMID: 34136946
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03758-7
Predict success of shock wave lithotripsy was still interesting and challenging
Comment on
-
Outcome groups and a practical tool to predict success of shock wave lithotripsy in daily clinical routine.World J Urol. 2021 Mar;39(3):943-951. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03253-5. Epub 2020 May 20. World J Urol. 2021. PMID: 32436072
References
-
- Hirsch B, Abt D, Güsewell S, Langenauer J, Betschart P, Pratsinis M, Vetterlein MW, Schmid HP, Wildermuth S, Zumstein V (2021) Outcome groups and a practical tool to predict success of shock wave lithotripsy in daily clinical routine. World J Urol 39(3):943–951 - DOI
-
- El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51(6):1688–1694 - DOI
-
- Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, Ghiculete D, Chung DG, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT (2008) Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 72(4):765–769 - DOI
-
- Abdel-Khalek M, Sheir KZ, Mokhtar AA, Eraky I, Kenawy M, Bazeed M (2004) Prediction of success rate after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of renal stones–a multivariate analysis model. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38(2):161–167 - DOI
-
- Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iguchi T, Nishizawa S, Kikkawa K, Hara I (2020) Ureteral wall volume at ureteral stone site is a critical predictor for shock wave lithotripsy outcomes: comparison with ureteral wall thickness and area. Urolithiasis 48(4):361–368 - DOI