Blood flow restriction training on resting blood pressure and heart rate: a meta-analysis of the available literature
- PMID: 34140637
- DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00561-0
Blood flow restriction training on resting blood pressure and heart rate: a meta-analysis of the available literature
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the effects of blood flow restriction training on resting blood pressure and heart rate. A meta-analysis was completed in May 2020 including all previously published papers on blood flow restriction and was analyzed using a random effects model. To be included, studies needed to implement a blood flow restriction protocol compared to the same exercise protocol without restriction. A total of four studies met the inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis including four effect sizes for resting systolic blood pressure, four effect sizes for resting diastolic blood pressure, and three effect sizes for resting heart rate. There was evidence of a difference [mean difference (95 CI)] in resting systolic blood pressure between training with and without blood flow restriction [4.2 (0.3, 8.0) mmHg, p = 0.031]. No significant differences were observed when comparing resting diastolic blood pressure [1.2 (-1, 3.5) mmHg p = 0.274] and resting heart rate [-0.2 (-4.7, 4.1) bpm, p = 0.902] between chronic exercise with and without blood flow restriction. These results indicate that training with blood flow restriction may elicit an increase in resting systolic blood pressure. However, lack of data addressing this topic makes any conclusion speculative. Based on the results of the present study along with the overall lack of long-term data, it is suggested that future research on this topic is warranted. Recommendations include making changes in resting blood pressure a primary outcome and increasing the sample size of the interventions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
References
-
- Mattocks KT, Jessee MB, Counts BR, Buckner SL, Grant Mouser J, Dankel SJ, et al. The effects of upper body exercise across different levels of blood flow restriction on arterial occlusion pressure and perceptual responses. Physiol Behav. 2017;15:181–6. - DOI
-
- Renzi CP, Tanaka H, Sugawara J. Effects of Leg Blood Flow Restriction during Walking on Cardiovascular Function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:726–32. - DOI
-
- Brandner CR, Kidgell DJ, Warmington SA. Unilateral bicep curl hemodynamics: low-pressure continuous vs high-pressure intermittent blood flow restriction. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25:770–7. - DOI
-
- Mouser JG, Mattocks KT, Dankel SJ, Buckner SL, Jessee MB, Bell ZW, et al. Very-low-load resistance exercise in the upper body with and without blood flow restriction: cardiovascular outcomes. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Physiol Appl Nutr Metab. 2019;44:288–92. - DOI
-
- Neto GR, Sousa MSC, Costa PB, Salles BF, Novaes GS, Novaes JS. Hypotensive Effects of Resistance Exercises With Blood Flow Restriction. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:1064–70. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous