Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 15:267:108164.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108164.

An impact of agronomic practices of sustainable rice-wheat crop intensification on food security, economic adaptability, and environmental mitigation across eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains

Affiliations

An impact of agronomic practices of sustainable rice-wheat crop intensification on food security, economic adaptability, and environmental mitigation across eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains

J S Mishra et al. Field Crops Res. .

Abstract

In the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains (EIGP), conventional rice-wheat system has led to a decline in productivity, input-use efficiency, and profitability. To address these, a four-year field study was conducted to evaluate the performance of tillage and crop establishment (TCE) methods in rice-wheat-greengram rotation. The treatments included: 1) random puddled transplanted rice (RPTR) - conventional-till broadcast wheat (BCW) - zero-till greengram (ZTG); 2) line PTR (LPTR) - conventional-till drill sown wheat (CTW) - ZTG; 3) machine transplanted rice in puddled soil (CTMTR) - zero tillage wheat (ZTW) - ZTG; 4) machine transplanted rice in zero-till wet soil (ZTMTR) - ZTW - ZTG; 5) system of rice intensification (SRI) - system of wheat intensification (SWI) - ZTG; 6) direct-seeded rice (DSR) - ZTW - ZTG; and 7) zero-till DSR - ZTW - ZTG. During the initial two years, conventional rice system (PTR) recorded a 16.2 % higher rice grain yield than DSR system. Whereas in the fourth year, the rice yields under DSR and PTR were comparable. As compared to SRI/SWI, the average wheat yield in ZT system was significantly high, whereas in rice, SRI/SWI system was comparable with CT system. ZTW after non-puddled rice was at par to CTW after PTR. The ZT wheat produced 4.6 % more yield than CT system. DSR production system consumed 6.8 % less water compared to transplanted system. On the system basis, 10.8 % higher net returns were recorded with CA-based system compared to conventional system. The system energy productivity under CA-based production system was 14-36 % higher than PTR-based systems. CA-based system also led to 8-10 % lower global warming potential (GWP) than conventional methods. The current study indicated that as compared to conventional system, a significant gain in productivity, profitability and energy-use efficiency, and reduction in the environmental mitigation are possible with emerging alternative TCE methods. Long-term expansion and further refinement of these technologies in local areas need to be explored for the second green revolution.

Keywords: Energy use; Global warming potential; Residue management; Resource conservation technologies; Rice-wheat-greengram system; Triple zero-tillage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The mean monthly maximum temperature (Tmax °C), minimum temperature (Tmin °C) and total monthly rainfall (mm) for 4 crop years (2015–16 to 2018–19).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean soil temperature (0–5 cm depth) during the entire wheat season affected by different crop establishment methods.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Changes in photosynthesis rate at anthesis stage under treatments in a) rice (2017) and b) wheat (2017–18).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Earthworm population and fresh weight (30 × 30 × 30 cm soil depth) during the wet season (rice crop) as affected by different tillage and crop establishment methods.

References

    1. Alam M.K., Biswas W.K., Bell R.W. Greenhouse gas implications of novel and conventional rice production technologies in the Eastern-Gangetic plains. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;112:3977–3987.
    1. Alves B.J.R., Jantalila C.P., Soares L.H.D.B., Urquiaga S., Boddey R.M. Diversifying crop rotation with N2-fixing legumes. In: Joshi P.K., Challa J., Virmani S.M., editors. Conservation Agriculture-Innovations for Improving Efficiency, Equity and Environment. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS); Pusa, New Delhi, India: 2010. pp. 663–683.
    1. Ashworth A.J., Allen F.L., Tyler D.D., Pote D.H., Shipitalo M.J. Earthworm populations are affected from long-term crop sequences and bio-covers under no-tillage. Pedobiologia. 2017;60:27–33.
    1. Awan T.H., Ahmad M., Ashraf M.M., Ali I. Effect of different transplanting methods on paddy yield and its components at farmer’s field in rice zone of Punjab. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2011;21:498–502.
    1. Babu S., Mohapatra K.P., Das A., Yadav G.S., Tahasildar M., Singh R., Panwar A.S., Yadav V., Chandra P. Designing energy-efficient, economically sustainable and environmentally safe cropping system for the rainfed maize–fallow land of the Eastern Himalayas. Sci. Total Environ. 2020 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources