A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely ® guidelines
- PMID: 34142016
- PMCID: PMC8206400
- DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab031
A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementing Choosing Wisely ® guidelines
Abstract
Objective: To identify important barriers and facilitators relating to the feasibility of implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as clinical decision support (CDS).
Materials and methods: We conducted a qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews from seven interviews with dyads (one clinical expert and one systems analyst) who discussed the feasibility of implementing 10 Choosing Wisely® guidelines at their institutions. We conducted a content analysis to extract salient themes describing facilitators, challenges, and other feasibility considerations regarding implementing CPGs as CDS.
Results: We identified five themes: concern about data quality impacts implementation planning; the availability of data in a computable format is a primary factor for implementation feasibility; customized strategies are needed to mitigate uncertainty and ambiguity when translating CPGs to an electronic health record-based tool; misalignment of expected CDS with pre-existing clinical workflows impact implementation; and individual level factors of end-users must be considered when selecting and implementing CDS tools.
Discussion: The themes reveal several considerations for CPG as CDS implementations regarding data quality, knowledge representation, and sociotechnical issues. Guideline authors should be aware that using CDS to implement CPGs is becoming increasingly popular and should consider providing clear guidelines to aid implementation. The complex nature of CPG as CDS implementation necessitates a unified effort to overcome these challenges.
Conclusion: Our analysis highlights the importance of cooperation and co-development of standards, strategies, and infrastructure to address the difficulties of implementing CPGs as CDS. The complex interactions between the concepts revealed in the interviews necessitates the need that such work should not be conducted in silos. We also implore that implementers disseminate their experiences.
Keywords: clinical decision support; electronic health record; implementation science; practice guidelines as topic; qualitative research.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Barriers to Implementing Registered Nurse-Driven Clinical Decision Support for Antibiotic Stewardship: Retrospective Case Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 23;8:e54996. doi: 10.2196/54996. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38781006 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool to Implement Asthma Management Guidelines in Pediatric Primary Care: Qualitative Study.JMIR Form Res. 2025 Mar 18;9:e65794. doi: 10.2196/65794. JMIR Form Res. 2025. PMID: 40100268 Free PMC article.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Clinicians' attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.Implement Sci. 2020 May 27;15(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00991-3. Implement Sci. 2020. PMID: 32460797 Free PMC article.
-
Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records.BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05688-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020. PMID: 32933513 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Interruptive Electronic Alerts for Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1941-1948. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac139. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022. PMID: 36018731 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Murad MH. Clinical practice guidelines: a primer on development and dissemination. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92 (3): 423–33. - PubMed
-
- Delvaux N, Van Thienen K, Heselmans A, et al.The effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on laboratory test ordering: a systematic review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141 (4): 585–95. - PubMed
-
- Meyer M, Donsa K, Truskaller T, et al.Development of a protocol for automated glucose measurement transmission used in clinical decision support systems based on the continua design guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform 2018; 248: 132–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources