Effect of Arrival Quarantine on Subsequent COVID-19 Testing in a Cohort of Military Basic Trainees
- PMID: 34142709
- DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab247
Effect of Arrival Quarantine on Subsequent COVID-19 Testing in a Cohort of Military Basic Trainees
Abstract
Introduction: Basic Military Training at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland implemented several sequential non-pharmaceutical interventions in response to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). One measure, arrival quarantine, has not been studied as a modern military disease prevention strategy. This study aimed to determine the effect of a 14-day arrival quarantine on symptomatic COVID-19 testing.
Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study compared symptomatic COVID-19 testing among all trainees who entered Basic Military Training between March 17, 2020, and April 17, 2020, before the implementation of universal arrival COVID-19 testing, during their first 2 weeks in arrival quarantine compared to the rest of their training. Furthermore, symptomatic COVID-19 testing in the last 5 weeks of training in those who completed arrival quarantine was compared to testing in the last 5 weeks for trainees who arrived between February 16, 2020, and March 16, 2020, and did not undergo arrival quarantine. Nominal variables were compared by chi-square test, and continuous variables were compared by Mann-Whitney U test. This study was approved as a public health surveillance project by the 59th Medical Wing Institutional Review Board.
Results: Five thousand five hundred and seventy-six trainees started training between February 16, 2020, and April 17, 2020, with 2,573 trainees undergoing an arrival quarantine compared to 3,003 trainees who did not. Trainees who underwent arrival quarantine had higher rates of COVID-19 testing while in arrival quarantine (10.5 tests per 1,000 trainee-weeks vs. 2.3, P ≤ .001) and higher rates of concomitant influenza testing (74% vs. 38%, P = .001) compared to after they completed quarantine. Trainees that completed quarantine had less symptomatic COVID-19 testing after day 14 of training (2.3 tests per 1,000 trainee-weeks vs. 14.3, P ≤ .001) and influenza testing (38% vs. 74%, P = .001) compared to trainees that did not undergo arrival quarantine.
Conclusion: Arrival quarantine appears to be an effective non-pharmaceutical intervention associated with fewer symptomatic COVID-19 tests, especially after completion of quarantine.
Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2021. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Similar articles
-
Risk Factors Associated With COVID-19 Transmission Among US Air Force Trainees in a Congregant Setting.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210202. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0202. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 33630090 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Arrival Surveillance Screening by Nucleic Acid Amplification Versus Rapid Antigen Detection on Subsequent COVID-19 Infections in Military Trainees.Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):65-69. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad466. Clin Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 37610361
-
Preventing and Mitigating SARS-CoV-2 Transmission - Four Overnight Camps, Maine, June-August 2020.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 4;69(35):1216-1220. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935e1. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 32881850 Free PMC article.
-
Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among recruits in a US Army training environment: a brief report.J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Aug 28;45(3):748-752. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad026. J Public Health (Oxf). 2023. PMID: 37132356 Free PMC article.
-
Successful Control of an Onboard COVID-19 Outbreak Using the Cruise Ship as a Quarantine Facility, Western Australia, Australia.Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 May;27(5):1279-1287. doi: 10.3201/eid2705.204142. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33900170 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous