A simple prediction score for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
- PMID: 34143312
- DOI: 10.1007/s00535-021-01797-w
A simple prediction score for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Abstract
Background: No prediction scores for the mortality of both inpatients and outpatients who developed nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) without endoscopic findings have been established. We aimed to derive and validate a novel prediction score for in-hospital mortality.
Methods: We conducted a three-stage, multicenter retrospective study. In the derivation stage, patients with nonvariceal UGIB at six institutions were enrolled to derive the prediction score by logistic regression analysis. External validation of the score was performed to analyze discrimination by patients at six other institutions. Then the performance of this score was compared with that of four existing scores.
Results: We enrolled 1380 and 825 patients in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. A prediction score (CHAMPS-R Score) comprising seven variables (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2, in-hospital onset, albumin < 2.5 g/dL, altered mental status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2, steroids, and rebleeding) with equal-weight scores was established, with high discriminative ability in both derivation and validation cohorts (c statistic, 0.91 and 0.80, respectively). When rebeeding was excluded from the score (an onset model; CHAMPS Score), this score also achieved high discriminative ability (c statistic, 0.90 and 0.81, respectively). The prediction scores had significantly higher discriminative ability than the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, ABC Score, and clinical Rockall Score in both cohorts (all, p < 0.05).
Conclusions: We derived and externally validated prediction scores for in-hospital mortality in patients with nonvariceal UGIB. The CHAMPS Score might be optimal for managing such patients. Its mobile application is freely available ( https://apps.apple.com/app/id1565716902 for iOS and https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=hatta.CHAMPS for Android).
Keywords: CHAMPS Score; In-hospital mortality; Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Prediction score.
© 2021. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.
Similar articles
-
CHAMPS score in predicting mortality of patients with acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Apr 14;69(4):e20221052. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20221052. eCollection 2023. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023. PMID: 37075441 Free PMC article.
-
AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 26;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1051-8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019. PMID: 31349816 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.Rom J Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;57(4):322-333. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2019-0016. Rom J Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31268861
-
Initial Assessment and Resuscitation in Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;25(3):429-42. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Apr 18. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015. PMID: 26142029 Review.
-
Strengths and limitations of risk stratification tools for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a narrative review.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(8):795-803. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2242252. Epub 2023 Jul 31. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37496492 Review.
Cited by
-
Validating the CHAMPS Score: A Novel and Reliable Prognostic Score of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 15;17:201-211. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S469218. eCollection 2024. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2024. PMID: 39050121 Free PMC article.
-
Ankaferd blood stopper: A novel additional strategy for less experienced gastroenterologists in gastrointestinal bleeding treatment.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38319. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038319. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39259086 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a prediction score for Barrett's esophagus in Japanese health checkup settings.Esophagus. 2024 Oct;21(4):552-562. doi: 10.1007/s10388-024-01079-3. Epub 2024 Aug 19. Esophagus. 2024. PMID: 39158677
-
A New Preoperative Scoring System for Predicting Aggressiveness of Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 3;12(2):397. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020397. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35204488 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for rebleeding in gastroduodenal ulcers.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Feb;193(1):173-179. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03450-2. Epub 2023 Jul 11. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 37432526
References
-
- Laine L, Yang H, Chang SC, et al. Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:1190–5. - DOI
-
- Wuerth BA, Rockey DC. Changing epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in the last decade: a nationwide analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63:1286–93. - DOI
-
- Abougergi MS, Travis AC, Saltzman JR. The in-hospital mortality rate for upper GI hemorrhage has decreased over 2 decades in the United States: a nationwide analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:882–8. - DOI
-
- Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, et al. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 2011;60:1327–35. - DOI
-
- Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:345–60. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical