Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 18;11(1):12871.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92460-0.

Combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C enhanced therapeutic efficacy in HER2 positive tumor model

Affiliations

Combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C enhanced therapeutic efficacy in HER2 positive tumor model

Nagarajan Vinod et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Lanatoside C has a promising anti-tumor activity and is a potential candidate for radiosensitizers. In this study, we have investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C for inhibition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive tumor progression in NCI-N87 xenograft model. The combination treatment (131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C) showed highest cytotoxicity when compared to non-treated control or trastuzumab alone or 131I alone or 131I-trastuzumab alone in vitro. Biodistribution studies using 131I-trastuzumab or combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C showed tumor uptake in BALB/c nude mice bearing HER2 positive NCI-N87 tumor xenograft model. The higher tumor uptake was observed in 131I-trastuzumab (19.40 ± 0.04% ID/g) than in the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C (14.02 ± 0.02% ID/g) at 24 h post-injection. Most importantly, an antitumor effect was observed in mice that received the combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C (p = 0.009) when compared to control. In addition, mice received lanatoside C alone (p = 0.085) or 131I-trastuzumab alone (p = 0.160) did not significantly inhibit tumor progression compared with control. Taken together, our data suggest that combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C might be a potential synergistic treatment for radioimmunotherapy to control the HER2 positive tumor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Lanatoside C suppressed growth of cancel cell lines. Inhibitory effect of lanatoside C on cell viability of NCI-N87 (A) and MDA-MB231 (B) cells. Data are presented as percentage of cell viability in which the 0.01% DMSO treated control sample is set 100%. The average of experimental triplicates ± standard deviation is shown. ***p < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Lanatoside C enhanced 131I-trastuzumab RIT in vitro. NCI-N87 cells were treated with various activity of 131I-trastuzumab RIT (A), 131I-trastuzumab RIT combined with lanatoside C (B), 131I alone (C) and trastuzumab alone (D), and cell viability was determined by Ez-Cytox assay. Data are presented as percentage of cell viability in which the 0.01% DMSO treated control sample is set 100%. The average of experimental triplicates ± standard deviation is shown. ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lanatoside C enhanced 131I-trastuzumab RIT in xenograft model. When the NCI-N87 tumor volume reached approximately 150 mm3, the BALB/c nude mice were treated with non-treated control group (untreated control), vehicle control group (0.01% DMSO in saline, 100 μl, the first 3 days), lanatoside C (6 mg/kg body weight, the first 3 days intraperitoneal injection), 131I-trastuzumab group (400 μCi, once tail vein injection), and combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C (lanatoside C, 6 mg/kg body weight, the first 3 days intraperitoneal injection, and 131I-trastuzumab, 400 μCi, once tail vein injection). **p < 0.01, and *p < 0.05.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biodistribution pattern (% ID/g) of 131I-trastuzumab or combination of 131I-trastuzumab and lanatoside C in tumor (tumor xenograft NCI-N87) bearing BALB/c nude mice at 4 h (A), 24 h (B), and 48 h (C).

References

    1. Bethge WA, Sandmaier BM. Targeted cancer therapy using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2005;4:393–405. doi: 10.1177/153303460500400407. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson SM, Carrasquillo JA, Cheung NK, Press OW. Radioimmunotherapy of human tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2015;15:347–360. doi: 10.1038/nrc3925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Navarro-Teulon I, Lozza C, Pelegrin A, Vives E, Pouget JP. General overview of radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors. Immunotherapy. 2013;5:467–487. doi: 10.2217/imt.13.34. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deshayes E, et al. Tandem myeloablative 131I-rituximab radioimmunotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy in refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Immunotherapy. 2013;5:1283–1286. doi: 10.2217/imt.13.138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frost SH, et al. Comparative efficacy of 177Lu and 90Y for anti-CD20 pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in murine lymphoma xenograft models. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120561. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms