Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;44(9):957-971.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01086-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in Eudravigilance

Affiliations

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity: An Analysis of Spontaneous Reports in Eudravigilance

Annamaria Mascolo et al. Drug Saf. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in the treatment of many cancers as they improve clinical outcomes. However, ICIs have also been associated with the development of immune-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Among immune-related ADRs, cardiac immune-related ADRs are rare, but also associated with high mortality rates.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiac ADRs reported with ICIs in the European spontaneous reporting system.

Methods: We retrieved individual case safety reports on ICI-induced cardiac ADRs from the website of suspected ADR ( www.adrreports.eu ) of the European pharmacovigilance database (Eudravigilance). Data were retrieved from the date of marketing authorization of each ICI (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, avelumab, and cemiplimab) to 14 March, 2020. The reporting odds ratio and its 95% confidence interval were computed to assess the reporting frequency of cardiac ADRs for each ICI compared to all other ICIs.

Results: A total of 2478 individual case safety reports with at least one ICI as the suspected drug were retrieved from Eudravigilance, of which 249 (10%) reported more than one ICI. The three most reported ICIs were nivolumab (43.2%), pembrolizumab (32.5%), and the association of nivolumab/ipilimumab (9.4%). A total of 3388 cardiac ADRs were identified. Cardiac ADRs were serious (99.4%) and had a fatal outcome (30.1%). The most reported cardiac events were myocarditis, cardiac failure, atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, and myocardial infarction. Nivolumab was reported with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs (reporting odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.18).

Conclusions: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced cardiac ADRs were serious and had unfavorable outcomes. In our study, nivolumab was the only ICI with a small increased reporting frequency of individual case safety reports with cardiac ADRs compared to all other ICIs. In this regard, further head-to-head studies are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Marzia Del Re: Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Pierre-Fabre, and Janssen (scientific advisory board, consulting relationship) and Ipsen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi Genzyme (travel, accommodation, expenses). Romano Danesi: Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, and EUSA Pharma (scientific advisory board, consulting relationship) and Ipsen and Sanofi Genzyme (travel, accommodation, expenses). Annamaria Mascolo, Cristina Scavone, Carmen Ferrajolo, Concetta Rafaniello, Antonio Russo, Enrico Coscioni, Francesco Rossi, Roberto Alfano, and Annalisa Capuano have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Time to the event of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) with ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. IQR interquartile range
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reporting odds ratio (ROR) of individual case safety reports with cardiac adverse events for each immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) compared to all other ICIs. CI confidence interval
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reporting odds ratio (ROR) of individual case safety reports with cardiac adverse events for each immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) compared to all other ICIs belonging to the same drug class. CI confidence interval, PD-1 programmed cell death protein 1, PD-L1 programmed death-ligand 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Reporting odds ratio (ROR) of individual case safety reports with cardiac adverse events for anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) compared to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). CI confidence interval

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Teixidó C, Vilariño N, Reyes R, Reguart N. PD-L1 expression testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918763493. doi: 10.1177/1758835918763493. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koster BD, De Gruijl TD, Van Den Eertwegh AJM. Recent developments and future challenges in immune checkpoint inhibitory cancer treatment. Curr Opin Oncol. 2015;27:482–488. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guan M, Zhou Y-P, Sun J-L, Chen S-C. Adverse events of monoclonal antibodies used for cancer therapy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:428169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ, Atkins MB, Brassil KJ, Caterino JM, et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1714–1768. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michot JM, Bigenwald C, Champiat S, Collins M, Carbonnel F, Postel-Vinay S, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer. 2016;54:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types