Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;43(6):1405-1421.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13311. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

Beyond deficit: 'strengths-based approaches' in Indigenous health research

Affiliations
Review

Beyond deficit: 'strengths-based approaches' in Indigenous health research

Joanne Bryant et al. Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Health research concerning Indigenous peoples has been strongly characterised by deficit discourse-a 'mode of thinking' that is overly focused on risk behaviours and problems. Strengths-based approaches offer a different perspective by promoting a set of values that recognise the capacities and capabilities of Indigenous peoples. In this article, we seek to understand the conceptual basis of strengths-based approaches as currently presented in health research. We propose that three main approaches exist: 'resilience' approaches concerned with the personal skills of individuals; 'social-ecological' approaches, which focus on the individual, community and structural aspects of a person's environment; and 'sociocultural' approaches, which view 'strengths' as social relations, collective identities and practices. We suggest that neither 'resilience' nor 'social-ecological' approaches sufficiently problematise deficit discourse because they remain largely informed by Western concepts of individualised rationality and, as a result, rest on logics that support notions of absence and deficit. In contrast, sociocultural approaches tend to view 'strengths' not as qualities possessed by individuals, but as the structure and character of social relations, collective practices and identities. As such, they are better able to capture Indigenous ways of knowing and being and provide a stronger basis on which to build meaningful interventions.

Keywords: Aboriginal; Indigenous; resilience; social-ecological approaches; strengths-based approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Rountree, J., & Smith, A. (2016). Strength-based well-being indicators for Indigenous children and families: A literature review of Indigenous communities’ identified well-being indicators. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 23(3), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2303.2016.206
    1. Ahenakew, C. (2016). Grafting Indigenous ways of knowing onto non-Indigenous ways of being: the (underestimated) challenges of a decolonial imagination. International Review of Qualitative Research, 9(3), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2016.9.3.323
    1. Askew, D., Brady, K., Mukandi, B., Singh, D., Sinha, S., Brough, M., & Bond, C. J. (2020). Closing the gap between rhetoric and practice in strengths-based approaches to Indigenous public health: A qualitative study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 44(2), 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12953
    1. Bainbridge, R., Whiteside, M., & McCalman, J. (2013). Being, knowing, and doing: A phronetic approach to constructing grounded theory with Aboriginal Australian partners. Qualitative Health Research, 23(2), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312467853
    1. Bamblett, M., & Lewis, P. (2006). Embedding culture for a positive future for Koori kids. Developing Practice: The Child, Youth and Family Work Journal, 11(17), 58-66.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources