Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review
- PMID: 34146242
- DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01267-4
Use and impact of breast cancer survivorship care plans: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Survivorship care plan (SCP) comprising a treatment summary and plan for follow-up care is recommended by various organizations to address long-term needs of an increasing number of breast cancer survivors. Although there have been previous systematic reviews of SCPs in cancer, none has focused on breast cancer exclusively. This systematic review evaluates the use and impact of SCP in breast cancer survivors.
Methods: Randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized (non-RCT) studies evaluating health care and patient-related outcomes after implementation of SCPs for survivors were identified by searching databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, and Scopus). Data were extracted, quality assessed, and summarized on the basis of qualitative synthesis.
Results: Ten non-RCTs and 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Although the overall quality of RCTs was superior to non-RCTs with mean quality score of 81.5% vs 64.3%, two mixed-methods non-RCTs which were individualized and included both provider and patient perspectives had comparable scores like RCTs. Several models of SCP were evaluated (paper based/online, oncologist/nurse/primary-care physician-delivered, and different templates). Descriptive information from non-RCTs suggests improvement in survivorship knowledge, satisfaction with care, and improved communication with providers. Findings from RCTs were variable. Potential gaps existed in content of SCP including unclear recommendation on frequency and ownership of follow-up. Levels of survivor satisfaction with, and self-reported understanding of, their SCP were high. Distal outcomes like health care delivery measures including costs and efficiency were mostly mixed, but heterogeneous study designs make interpretation difficult.
Conclusions: Existing research provides positive impact of SCPs on more proximal outcomes of patient experience and care delivery but mixed results for health outcomes in breast cancer survivors. Future research should focus on better defining SCP content and ensuring follow-up recommendations are acted upon, and provider feedback is included and use of novel tools to empower stakeholders.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Care pathway; Survivorship care plan.
© 2021. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.
References
-
- Li N, Deng Y, Zhou L, et al. Global burden of breast cancer and attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, from 1990 to 2017: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):1–12. - DOI
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer Data in Australia [online book]. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2020. [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents... ].
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia 2017. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2017. [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-in-australia-2017/contents... ].
-
- Institute of Medicine. 2006. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition: n American Society of Clinical Oncology and Institute of Medicine Symposium. The National Academies Press, Washington
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous