Determining maximal achievable effect sizes of antidepressant therapies in placebo-controlled trials
- PMID: 34146343
- DOI: 10.1111/acps.13340
Determining maximal achievable effect sizes of antidepressant therapies in placebo-controlled trials
Abstract
Objective: Antidepressants outperform placebo with an effect size of around 0.30. It has been suggested that effect sizes as high as 0.875 are necessary for a minimal clinically important difference. Whether such effect sizes are achievable in placebo-controlled trials is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to assess what effect sizes are theoretically achievable in placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants.
Methods: Patient-level analyses comparing Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) outcomes for simulated antidepressant therapies to placebo-treated participants (n = 2201) from clinical trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.
Results: An optimally effective antidepressant, where all treated participants achieve HDRS-17 scores comparable to those displayed by healthy volunteers (remission-type model), had a maximum effect size of 1.75, with a mean difference of 11.6 points on the HDRS-17. In simulations where patients received an additional 50% symptom reduction over that obtained with placebo (improvement-type model), the maximum effect size was 1.08 with a mean HDRS-17 difference of 7.2. When adjusting for normal rates of treatment discontinuation, maximum effect sizes were 1.10 (remission-type model) and 0.76 (improvement-type model) with HDRS-17 mean differences of 8.8 and 5.6, respectively.
Conclusions: Three methodological issues (i) a large and variable placebo response, (ii) a high rate of dropout and (iii) HDRS-17-ratings significantly larger than zero in healthy volunteers, reduce the degree of treatment-placebo separation achievable in depression trials. Assuming that those who discontinue treatment have only partial response, even a highly effective antidepressant would have difficulties surpassing such effect size cut-offs as have been suggested to signify a minimal clinically important difference.
Keywords: antidepressive agents; depression; minimal clinically important difference; placebo effect; serotonin uptake inhibitors.
© 2021 The Authors. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Hieronymus F, Jauhar S, Ostergaard SD, Young AH. One (effect) size does not fit at all: Interpreting clinical significance and effect sizes in depression treatment trials. J Psychopharmacol. 2020;34:1074-1078.
-
- Hengartner MP, Ploderl M. Statistically significant antidepressant-placebo differences on subjective symptom-rating scales do not prove that the drugs work: effect size and method bias matter!. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:517.
-
- Jakobsen JC, Gluud C, Kirsch I. Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder? BMJ Evidence-Based Med. 2019;25(4):130.
-
- Jakobsen JC, Katakam KK, Schou A, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:58.
-
- Moncrieff J, Kirsch I. Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant-placebo differences. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;43:60-62.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
