[E. Verspyck et al. in response to the correspondence by R. Bessis et al. about the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie-Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10): S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001]
- PMID: 34146755
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.06.007
[E. Verspyck et al. in response to the correspondence by R. Bessis et al. about the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie-Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10): S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001]
Comment on
-
[R. Bessis et al. in response to the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10à:S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Nov;49(11):874-876. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021. PMID: 34146756 French. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
