[R. Bessis et al. in response to the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10à:S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001]
- PMID: 34146756
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.06.006
[R. Bessis et al. in response to the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10à:S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001]
Comment in
-
[E. Verspyck et al. in response to the correspondence by R. Bessis et al. about the Opinion by E. Verspyck et al.: Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country? Gynécologie-Obstétrique Fertilité & Sénologie 2021; 49 (10): S246871892100129X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Nov;49(11):876-877. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021. PMID: 34146755 French. No abstract available.
Comment on
-
[Which fetal growth curve reference should be now chosen for our country?].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021 Oct;49(10):801-802. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 11. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2021. PMID: 33989829 French. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
