Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;67(3):201-209.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.06.009. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Physiotherapists and patients report positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study

Affiliations

Physiotherapists and patients report positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study

Kim L Bennell et al. J Physiother. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Question: What were the experiences of physiotherapists and patients who consulted via videoconference during the COVID-19 pandemic and how was it implemented?

Design: Mixed methods study with cross-sectional national online surveys and qualitative analysis of free-text responses.

Participants: A total of 207 physiotherapists in private practice or community settings and 401 patients aged ≥ 18 years who consulted (individual and/or group) via videoconference from April to November 2020.

Methods: Separate customised online surveys were developed for physiotherapists and patients. Data were collected regarding the implementation of videoconferencing (cost, software used) and experience with videoconferencing (perceived effectiveness, safety, ease of use and comfort communicating, each scored on a 4-point ordinal scale). Qualitative content analysis was performed of physiotherapists' free-text responses about perceived facilitators, barriers and safety issues.

Results: Physiotherapists gave moderate-to-high ratings for the effectiveness of and their satisfaction with videoconferencing. Most intended to continue to offer individual consultations (81%) and group classes (60%) via videoconferencing beyond the pandemic. For individual consultations and group classes, respectively, most patients had moderately or extremely positive perceptions about ease of technology use (94%, 91%), comfort communicating (96%, 86%), satisfaction with management (92%, 93%), satisfaction with privacy/security (98%, 95%), safety (99% both) and effectiveness (83%, 89%). Compared with 68% for group classes, 47% of patients indicated they were moderately or extremely likely to choose videoconferencing for individual consultations in the future. Technology was predominant as both a facilitator and barrier. Falls risk was the main safety factor.

Conclusion: Patients and physiotherapists had overall positive experiences using videoconferencing for individual consultations and group classes. The results suggest that videoconferencing is a viable option for the delivery of physiotherapy care in the future.

Keywords: COVID-19; Experiences; Patient; Physical therapy; Telehealth; Video.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient ratings of their experiences with individual consultations via videoconference with their physiotherapist (n = 341). a Rated on a 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all easy’ to ‘extremely easy’. b Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all comfortable’ to ‘extremely comfortable’. c Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all satisfied’ to ‘extremely satisfied’. d Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all safe’ to ‘extremely safe’. e Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all effective’ to ‘extremely effective’. f Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all likely’ to ‘extremely likely’.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient ratings of their experiences with group classes via videoconference with their physiotherapist (n = 77). a Rated on a 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all easy’ to ‘extremely easy’. b Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all comfortable’ to ‘extremely comfortable’. c Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all satisfied’ to ‘extremely satisfied’. d Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all safe’ to ‘extremely safe’. e Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all effective’ to ‘extremely effective’. f Rated on 4-point scale ranging from ‘not at all likely’ to ‘extremely likely’.

References

    1. Grona S.L., Bath B., Busch A., Rotter T., Trask C., Harrison E. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24:341–355. - PubMed
    1. Cottrell M.A., Galea O.A., O'Leary S.P., Hill A.J., Russell T.G. Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:625–638. - PubMed
    1. Cottrell M.A., Russell T.G. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102193. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dario A.B., Moreti Cabral A., Almeida L., Ferreira M.L., Refshauge K., Simic M. Effectiveness of telehealth-based interventions in the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Spine J. 2017;17:1342–1351. - PubMed
    1. Shukla H., Nair S.R., Thakker D. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:339–346. - PubMed

Publication types