Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jun 20:27:e930617.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.930617.

Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver Reduces Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Patients During Carotid Endarterectomy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver Reduces Cerebral Oxygen Saturation and Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Patients During Carotid Endarterectomy

Lixia Li et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to determine the effects of alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) on cerebral oxygen saturation and cerebral blood velocity in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) before clamping of the carotid artery. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this crossover exploratory study, all patients were randomized to undergo an RM (30 cmH₂O of continuous airway pressure for 30 s) and a "sham" maneuver (SM; 5 cmH₂O for 30 s), followed by an alternative intervention after a 5-min equilibration period. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was used to monitor regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO₂), and transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) to evaluate blood velocity of the middle cerebral artery (V-MCA). Changes in rSO₂, V-MCA, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) in response to the 2 interventions were compared. RESULTS A total of 59 patients underwent the study procedure. RM reduced rSO₂, V-MCA, MAP, and HR, but these variables slightly changed during SM. A significant drop in rSO₂ was observed immediately after RM compared with the baseline value (68.51±4.4% vs 64.12±5.15%; P<0.001). The decrease in rSO₂ was higher during the RM than during the SM (-6±4% vs 1±2%; P<0.001). Similarly, change in V-MCA was more significant in response to RM than SM (-26±19% vs 19±16%; P<0.001). The V-MCA value changed from 39 cm/s to 29 cm/s after RM. In addition, V-MCA of the ipsilateral to the surgical side decreased more obviously than the contralateral side (-26±19% vs -20±17%; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS An RM at 30 cmH₂O of continuous airway pressure for 30 s decreased rSO₂ and V-MCA. In addition, MAP and HR were affected.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomized crossover study design involved 2 intervention periods: a recruitment maneuver (RM) of 30 cmH2O for 30 s and a sham maneuver (SM) of 5 cmH2O for 30 s at a different time point; the 2 procedures were separated by an equilibration period of 5 minutes. The observation targets were measured before and after each intervention period (pre-post RM and SM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram. RM – recruitment maneuver; SM – sham recruitment maneuver; rSO2 – regional oxygen saturation; V-MCA – blood flow velocity of the middle cerebral artery; HR – heart rate; MAP – mean arterial pressure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative changes in regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO2) and middle cerebral artery blood velocity (V-MCA) ipsilateral to the surgical side, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) from baseline in response to a recruitment maneuver (RM) and sham maneuver (SM), respectively. Changes in ipsilateral side (I) and contralateral side (C) were also compared. Values are mean±SD. (A) Changes of rSO2 comparison; # P<0.05, RM-IrSO2 vs SM-IrSO2; ## P<0.05, RM-CrSO2 vs SM-CrSO2; (B) Changes of V-MCA comparison; # P<0.05, RM IV-MCA vs SM IV-MCA and RM IV-MCA vs RM CV-MCA; ## P<0.05, SM IV-MCA vs SM CV-MCA; (C) Changes of HR comparison; # P<0.05, RM-HR vs SM-HR; (D) Changes of MAP comparison; # P<0.05, RM-MAP vs SM-MAP.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howell SJ. Carotid endarterectomy. Brit J Anaesth. 2007;99:119–31. - PubMed
    1. Marinò V, Aloj F, Vargas M, et al. Intraoperative neurological monitoring with evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy versus cooperative patients under general anesthesia technique. J Neurosurg Anesth. 2018;30:258–64. - PubMed
    1. Thirumala PD, Kumar H, Bertolet M, et al. Risk factors for cranial nerve deficits during carotid endarterectomy: A retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2015;130:150–54. - PubMed
    1. Kitagawa T, Ishikawa H, Yamamoto J, Ota S. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy and neurogenic pulmonary edema after carotid endarterectomy. World Neurosurg. 2019 [Online ahead of print] - PubMed
    1. Ballotta E, Da GG, Renon L, et al. Cranial and cervical nerve injuries after carotid endarterectomy: A prospective study. Surgery. 1999;125:85–91. - PubMed

Publication types