Facilitating health care workers' self-determination: The impact of a self-leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance
- PMID: 34149206
- PMCID: PMC8207124
- DOI: 10.1111/joop.12352
Facilitating health care workers' self-determination: The impact of a self-leadership intervention on work engagement, health, and performance
Abstract
The present study aims to test the impact of a self-leadership intervention on the work engagement, performance, and health of health care workers. By integrating self-determination theory and self-leadership theory, we propose that when employees are trained how they can autonomously influence own cognitions and behaviour, this will impact their work engagement, perceived performance, and general health. To test the hypotheses, a longitudinal field experiment with three measurement waves was conducted (pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention, and 2 months after the intervention). Health care professionals (n = 195) from five different organizations participated on voluntary basis and were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Results show that a self-leadership training positively impacts work engagement and performance of health care workers. Furthermore, the improved work engagement also mediates the effects of the training on health and performance 2 months later. No direct effect was found on general health. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Practitioners points: The self-leadership intervention facilitates healthcare workers to develop self-determination and autonomous motivation, which will positively impact their work engagement, health, and performanceParticipation in the self-leadership intervention needs to be based on volition as this will contribute to the intrinsic motivation for actual self-leadership development through training.
Keywords: Health care; Intervention study; Self‐Determination; Self‐leadership; Work engagement.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Alves, J. C. , Lovelace, K. J. , Manz, C. , Matsypura, D. , Toyasaki, F. , & Ke, K. (2006). A cross‐cultural perspective of self‐leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 338–359. 10.1108/02683940610663123 - DOI
-
- Amundsen, S. , & Martinsen, O. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self‐leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22, 304–323. 10.1177/1548051814565819 - DOI
-
- Assen, M. A. L. M. , & Bekker, M. H. J. (2009). Seks differences in autonomy‐connectedness: The role of personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(1), 12–17. 10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.039 - DOI
-
- Bakker, A. B. , Demerouti, E. , & Sanz‐Vergel, A. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD‐R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 389–411. 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 - DOI
-
- Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory and self‐regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248–287. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources