Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023;19(1):1-30.
doi: 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders

Laceé N Pappas  1 , Amy L Dent  1
Affiliations

The 40-year debate: a meta-review on what works for juvenile offenders

Laceé N Pappas et al. J Exp Criminol. 2023.

Abstract

Objectives: This meta-review integrates the findings of meta-analyses and systematic reviews to explore the effect of intervention programs on recidivism for juvenile offenders.

Methods: The systematic literature search gathered 48 meta-analyses and systematic reviews from 53 research reports, contributing 56 independent effect sizes for analysis. These effect sizes were statistically integrated, and five moderators of theoretical and methodological importance were tested using meta-regression.

Results: On average, intervention programs are associated with a significant reduction in recidivism (r Φ = -0.09, p < 0.001) for juvenile offenders who participate in a program compared to those who do not. However, reductions in recidivism significantly vary between the levels of criminal justice system, characteristics of juvenile offenders, types of program modalities, and methodological quality.

Conclusions: Results indicate that intervention programs can be an effective approach to reducing recidivism for juvenile offenders, especially when combined with a rehabilitative program modality.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11292-021-09472-z.

Keywords: Corrections; Juvenile offenders; Meta-analysis; Reentry; Rehabilitation; What works.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Psychological Association Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist. 2008;63(9):839–851. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). LexisNexis.
    1. Andrews DA, Dowden C. Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2006;50(1):88–100. doi: 10.1177/0306624X05282556. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andrews DA, Zinger I, Hoge RD, Bonta J, Gendreau P, Cullen FT. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology. 1990;28(3):369–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.1990.tb01330.x. - DOI
    1. Bakker M, van Dijk A, Wicherts JM. The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2012;7:543–554. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459060. - DOI - PubMed