Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 15;13(5):4884-4891.
eCollection 2021.

Influence of humanized care on self-efficacy, sleep and quality of life of patients in cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit

Affiliations

Influence of humanized care on self-efficacy, sleep and quality of life of patients in cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit

Zhihui Zeng et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Objective: The present study aims to investigate the influence of humanized care on self-efficacy, sleep quality (SQ) and quality of life (QOL) of patients in a cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit (CSICU).

Methods: A total of 134 patients hospitalized in CSICU from July, 2017 to September, 2019 were randomly allocated into control group and observation group, of which 64 in control group were given routine nursing care, and 70 in observation group were given humanized care additionally. The cardiopulmonary function, self-efficacy, SQ, incidence of adverse reactions, anxiety and depression, QOL, and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: After nursing, patients in the observation group showed enhanced cardiopulmonary function and self-efficacy, better SQ and QOL, as well as lower incidence of adverse reactions and anxiety and depression, and higher satisfaction.

Conclusion: Humanized care contributes to the recovery of cardiopulmonary function, and is effective in alleviating anxiety and depression and enhancing self-efficacy, SQ and QOL of patients in CSICU.

Keywords: Humanized care; cardiovascular surgery intensive care unit; self-efficacy; sleep quality and quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cardiopulmonary function of patients. A. FEV1/FVC: FEV1/FVC level of patients in two groups increase significantly after nursing, and the observation group is significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05); B. 6MWD: 6MWD level in observation group is significantly higher than that in control group after nursing (P<0.05). Note: *P<0.05 vs. on admission, #P<0.05 vs. control group. FEV1/FVC: forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity (FEVI/FVC); 6MWD: 6-minute walking distance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Self-efficacy of patients. GSES scores in the two groups increase evidently after 7 and 14 days of nursing, and the observation group is remarkably higher than the control group. Note: *P<0.05 vs. on admission, #P<0.05 vs. control group, ^P<0.05 vs. after 7 days of nursing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sleep quality of patients. PSQI scores in two groups decrease significantly after 7 and 14 days of nursing, and the observation group is remarkably lower than the control group (P<0.05). Note: *P<0.05 vs. on admission, #P<0.05 vs. control group, ^P<0.05 vs. after 7 days of nursing.
Figure 4
Figure 4
SAS and SDS scores of patients. A. SAS: SAS score decreases significantly in the two groups after nursing, and the observation group is significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05); B. SDS: SDS score decreases significantly in the two groups after nursing, and the observation group is significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05). Note: *P<0.05 vs. on admission, #P<0.05 vs. control group. SAS: Self-rating anxiety scale; SDS: Self-rating depression scale.

References

    1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, de Ferranti S, Despres JP, Fullerton HJ, Howard VJ, Huffman MD, Judd SE, Kissela BM, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Liu S, Mackey RH, Matchar DB, McGuire DK, Mohler ER 3rd, Moy CS, Muntner P, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Nichol G, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Reeves MJ, Rodriguez CJ, Sorlie PD, Stein J, Towfighi A, Turan TN, Virani SS, Willey JZ, Woo D, Yeh RW, Turner MB American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131:e29–322. - PubMed
    1. Mosala Nezhad Z, Poncelet A, de Kerchove L, Gianello P, Fervaille C, El Khoury G. Small intestinal submucosa extracellular matrix (CorMatrix(R)) in cardiovascular surgery: a systematic review. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:839–850. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pimpin L, Wu JH, Haskelberg H, Del Gobbo L, Mozaffarian D. Is butter back? A systematic review and meta-analysis of butter consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and total mortality. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0158118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim M, Yoon SJ, Choi JS, Kim MJ, Sim SB, Lee KS, Chee HK, Park NH, Park CS. Imbalance in cardiovascular surgery medical service use between regions. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;49:S14–S19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanon S, Lee VV, Elayda MA, Gondi S, Livesay JJ, Reul GJ, Wilson JM. Predicting early death after cardiovascular surgery by using the Texas Heart Institute Risk Scoring Technique (THIRST) Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40:156–162. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources