Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Nov;9(11):1221-1230.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00089-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

Postoperative continuous positive airway pressure to prevent pneumonia, re-intubation, and death after major abdominal surgery (PRISM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Collaborators
Free article
Clinical Trial

Postoperative continuous positive airway pressure to prevent pneumonia, re-intubation, and death after major abdominal surgery (PRISM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

PRISM trial group. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Nov.
Free article

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Respiratory complications are an important cause of postoperative morbidity. We aimed to investigate whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) administered immediately after major abdominal surgery could prevent postoperative morbidity.

Methods: PRISM was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 70 hospitals across six countries. Patients aged 50 years or older who were undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive CPAP within 4 h of the end of surgery or usual postoperative care. Patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated minimisation algorithm with inbuilt concealment. The primary outcome was a composite of pneumonia, endotracheal re-intubation, or death within 30 days after randomisation, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received CPAP. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN56012545.

Findings: Between Feb 8, 2016, and Nov 11, 2019, 4806 patients were randomly assigned (2405 to the CPAP group and 2401 to the usual care group), of whom 4793 were included in the primary analysis (2396 in the CPAP group and 2397 in the usual care group). 195 (8·1%) of 2396 patients in the CPAP group and 197 (8·2%) of 2397 patients in the usual care group met the composite primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 1·01 [95% CI 0·81-1·24]; p=0·95). 200 (8·9%) of 2241 patients in the CPAP group had adverse events. The most common adverse events were claustrophobia (78 [3·5%] of 2241 patients), oronasal dryness (43 [1·9%]), excessive air leak (36 [1·6%]), vomiting (26 [1·2%]), and pain (24 [1·1%]). There were two serious adverse events: one patient had significant hearing loss and one patient had obstruction of their venous catheter caused by a CPAP hood, which resulted in transient haemodynamic instability.

Interpretation: In this large clinical effectiveness trial, CPAP did not reduce the incidence of pneumonia, endotracheal re-intubation, or death after major abdominal surgery. Although CPAP has an important role in the treatment of respiratory failure after surgery, routine use of prophylactic post-operative CPAP is not recommended.

Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Barts Charity, Intersurgical, Association of Anaesthetists, and Sapienza Università di Roma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests RMP reports grants from National Institute for Health Research, grants and non-financial support from Intersurgical UK, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Edwards Life Sciences, outside of the submitted work; has given lectures or done consultancy work for Nestle Health Sciences, BBraun, Intersurgical, GlaxoSmithKline, and Edwards Lifesciences; and is on the editorial board for the British Journal of Anaesthesia and the British Journal of Surgery. TEFA reports grants from Medical Research Council, during the conduct of the study; has done consultancy work for Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside of the submitted work; and is a member of the associate editorial board of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. CA is a member of the associate editorial board of the Revista Española de Anestesiologia y Reanimación and Frontiers. TS is an associate editorial board member for Trials, Frontiers in Microbiology, Medicine, and Critical Care Explorations. MC reports consultancy and speaker fees from B Braun and Edwards Lifesciences; and is deputy editor-in-chief for the European Journal of Anaethesiology. All other members of the writing committee declare no competing interests.

Comment in

Publication types