Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;28(5):570-577.
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

Biomechanical comparison of four different posterior malleolus fixation techniques: A finite element analysis

Henrique Mansur  1 , Phelipe Pinheiro Alves Lucas  2 , Ricardo Carvalho Vitorino  2 , Fabrício Reichert Barin  3 , Anderson Freitas  4 , Leonardo Rigobello Battaglion  5 , Lucas Sacramento Ramos  6
Affiliations

Biomechanical comparison of four different posterior malleolus fixation techniques: A finite element analysis

Henrique Mansur et al. Foot Ankle Surg. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical behavior of four fixation methods for posterior malleolar fracture (PMF) by finite element analysis (FEM).

Methods: Four internal fixation techniques used for fixation of PMF were assessed by FEM - a computational study: posterior one-third tubular 3.5 mm buttress plate (PP) with one screw (PP 1 screw), PP with two screws (PP 2 screws), two cannulated 3.5 mm lag screws in the antero-posterior (AP) direction (AP lag screws), and two postero-anterior (PA) cannulated 3.5 mm lag screws (PA lag screws). PMF with 30% and 50% fragment sizes were simulated through computational processing reconstructed from computed tomography (CT). The simulated loads of 700 N and 1500 N were applied to the proximal tibial end. The FEM evaluated the total and localized displacements of the PMF. For the analysis of stresses, the variables maximum principal (traction) and minimum principal (compression) were used. For the metallic implants, the equivalent von Mises stress (VMS) was used.

Results: PA lag screw showed the lowest values for total and localized displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and VMS in both physiological conditions and sizes of posterior malleolus involvement. The localized displacement was statistically lower for lag screws compared to PP techniques at 700 N (p < 0.05) and 1200 N (p < 0.05). The maximum total stress was statistically lower for PA lag screws compared to PP 1 fixation with 700 N (p = 0.03) and 1200 N (p = 0.039).

Conclusion: PA lag screws yield better results in terms of total and localized displacement, minimum and maximum total stress, and VMS in both physiological conditions and sizes of posterior malleolus involvement. These results demonstrate that PA lag screws are biomechanically the most efficient technique for the fixation of PMF.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Finite element analysis; Internal fixations; Posterior malleolar fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources