Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 13;118(28):e2022666118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022666118.

Novel technologies for emission reduction complement conservation agriculture to achieve negative emissions from row-crop production

Affiliations
Review

Novel technologies for emission reduction complement conservation agriculture to achieve negative emissions from row-crop production

Daniel L Northrup et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Plants remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Because agriculture's productivity is based on this process, a combination of technologies to reduce emissions and enhance soil carbon storage can allow this sector to achieve net negative emissions while maintaining high productivity. Unfortunately, current row-crop agricultural practice generates about 5% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and European Union. To reduce these emissions, significant effort has been focused on changing farm management practices to maximize soil carbon. In contrast, the potential to reduce emissions has largely been neglected. Through a combination of innovations in digital agriculture, crop and microbial genetics, and electrification, we estimate that a 71% (1,744 kg CO2e/ha) reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from row crop agriculture is possible within the next 15 y. Importantly, emission reduction can lower the barrier to broad adoption by proceeding through multiple stages with meaningful improvements that gradually facilitate the transition to net negative practices. Emerging voluntary and regulatory ecosystems services markets will incentivize progress along this transition pathway and guide public and private investments toward technology development. In the difficult quest for net negative emissions, all tools, including emission reduction and soil carbon storage, must be developed to allow agriculture to maintain its critical societal function of provisioning society while, at the same time, generating environmental benefits.

Keywords: agriculture emission reduction; crop genetics; electrification; innovation; soil health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: D.L.N. is an employee of Benson Hill, a seed company that aims to produce sustainable and nutritious agricultural products. P.N.B. is cofounder and chair of the Scientific Advisory Board of High Fidelity Genetics, a technology company that aims to improve crop root traits. B.B. is a cofounder of CiBO Technologies, a crop modeling and agronomy company with digital agriculture solutions.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Technical improvements facilitate deep decarbonization of grain production. Numbers are shown as kilograms of CO2e per hectare and are separated by the emission source. The phases (optimize, replace, and redesign) are distinguished by the technical readiness of the enabling innovations. Implementing the optimization phase is largely possible using current technology, while replacement-phase technologies could be available in 2 to 5 y and redesign-phase technologies in 5 to 15 y.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Descriptions of the technologies that will be adopted in each phase in response to new policy and farm economics. The combination of technology in each system will lead to a dramatic reduction in farm emissions. 1Intercropping, rotation, and diversification image credit: Wikimedia Commons/Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2Electrical or biological nitrogen synthesis image credit: Wikimedia Commons/US Fish and Wildlife Service. 3Electric tractor image credit: Kubota. 4Automated small implements/robotics image credit: Chinmay Soman, Terrasentia.

Comment in

  • Reply to Amundson: Time to go to work.
    Northrup DL, Basso B, Wang MQ, Morgan CLS, Benfey PN. Northrup DL, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2122842119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2122842119. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 35302886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Negative emissions in agriculture are improbable in the near future.
    Amundson R. Amundson R. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2118142119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118142119. Epub 2022 Mar 18. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022. PMID: 35302887 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Masson-Delmotte V., et al. ., “Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty” (IPCC, 2018).
    1. Clark M. A., et al. ., Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets. Science 370, 705–708 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Searchinger T., Waite R., Hanson C., Ranganathan J., “Creating a sustainable food future” (World Resources Institute, 2019).
    1. Runck B. C., Khoury C. K., Ewing P. M., Kantar M., The hidden land use cost of upscaling cover crops. Commun. Biol. 3, 300 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cusser S., Bahlai C., Swinton S. M., Robertson G. P., Haddad N. M., Long-term research avoids spurious and misleading trends in sustainability attributes of no-till. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3715–3725 (2020). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources