Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 21;11(1):12957.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92301-0.

The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population

Affiliations

The effect of COVID19 pandemic restrictions on an urban rodent population

Miguel A Bedoya-Pérez et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Shortly after the enactment of restrictions aimed at limiting the spread of COVID-19, various local government and public health authorities around the world reported an increased sighting of rats. Such reports have yet to be empirically validated. Here we combined data from multi-catch rodent stations (providing data on rodent captures), rodent bait stations (providing data on rodent activity) and residents' complaints to explore the effects of a six week lockdown period on rodent populations within the City of Sydney, Australia. The sampling interval encompassed October 2019 to July 2020 with lockdown defined as the interval from April 1st to May 15th, 2020. Rodent captures and activity (visits to bait stations) were stable prior to lockdown. Captures showed a rapid increase and then decline during the lockdown, while rodent visits to bait stations declined throughout this period. There were no changes in the frequency of complaints during lockdown relative to before and after lockdown. There was a non-directional change in the geographical distribution of indices of rodent abundance suggesting that rodents redistributed in response to resource scarcity. We hypothesize that lockdown measures initially resulted in increased rodent captures due to sudden shortage of human-derived food resources. Rodent visits to bait stations might not show this pattern due to the nature of the binary data collected, namely the presence or absence of a visit. Relocation of bait stations driven by pest management goals may also have affected the detection of any directional spatial effect. We conclude that the onset of COVID-19 may have disrupted commensal rodent populations, with possible implications for the future management of these ubiquitous urban indicator species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rodent captures per trap day (a), probability of rodent captures per trap day (b), rodent visitation at bait stations (c) and rodent related residents’ complaints (d) recorded by the Council of the City of Sydney, prior during and post COVID-19 restrictions and social distancing measures imposed by the New South Wales State government (Mean ± SE). Superscripts represent Tukey-adjusted pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated rodent captures per trap (a), rodent visitation per bait station (b), and rodent related complaints (c), received by the Council of the City of Sydney over time. The shaded grey area represents the standard error of the mean (SE). Dashed vertical lines represent the start and end points of COVID-19 restrictions and social distancing measures imposed by the New South Wales State Government.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Locations of multi-catch rodent stations (formula image), rodent bait stations (formula image) and residents’ rodent complaints (formula image) within the Council of the City of Sydney. The eleven Statistical Area 2 (SA2) which make up the City of Sydney are shown. Map generated using ArcGIS Desktop v10.5.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of trapping success (a), rodent bait stations visitation (b) and residents’ rodent complaints (c) within the Council of the City of Sydney and their mean centers and associated directional ellipses during pre-lockdown (formula image), lockdown (formula image) and post-lockdown (formula image) periods. Maps generated using ArcGIS Desktop v10.5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tobin ME, Fall MW. USDA National Wildlife Research Center-Staff Publications. USDA National Wildlife Research Center-Staff Publications; 2006. pp. 1–21.
    1. Meerburg BG, Singleton GR, Kijlstra A. Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;35:221–270. doi: 10.1080/10408410902989837. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meerburg BG, Singleton GR, Leirs H. The Year of the Rat ends—Time to fight hunger! Pest. Manag. Sci. 2009;65:351–352. doi: 10.1002/ps.1718. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mills, J. N. The role of rodents in emerging human disease: Examples from the hantaviruses and arenaviruses. in Ecologically-Based Rodent Management (eds Grant R. Singleton, Lyn A. Hinds, Herwig Leirs, & Zhibin Zhang) 134–160 (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 1999)
    1. Barnett SA. The Story of Rats: Their Impact on Us, and Our Impact on Them. Allen & Unwin; 2001.

Publication types