Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis
- PMID: 34155436
- PMCID: PMC8209776
- DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01584-w
Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis
Abstract
Sustainable development is one of the issues that many developed and developing countries focus on in the world. The sustainability of human and natural resources is of great importance for securing the world and humanity's common future. In this context, this study aims to evaluate the socio-economic structure of Erzurum with analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and digitized strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis considering sustainable development goals (SDGs). The items included in the Agenda 21 report of the United Nations and 17 SDGs determined by the United Nations were taken into consideration in this endeavour. In line with expert opinions, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats created by the sustainable development goals for Erzurum province were analysed statistically with the AHP. Priority and weighted values of each sub-criterion were calculated. According to this analysis, "the richness of natural, cultural and historical resources for tourism potential" ranks first among the strengths of the province regarding sustainable development goals. Weaknesses include "insufficient investment and entrepreneurial culture". However, "priority region status for development" criterion stands out as the most important opportunity. Threats include "loss of labour force due to migration from agricultural areas" criterion. After the statistical analysis, the quantitative results of made for the best realization of sustainable development for the area were assessed to specify new goals and strategies. Suggestions were offered to define opportunities and strengths, threats and weaknesses with new-build strategies and to make the plans accordingly.
Keywords: AHP; Erzurum province; SWOT analysis; Sustainable development.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021, Corrected publication 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Aagaard Nielsen, K., Elling, B., Figueroa, M., & Jelsøe, E. (2010). A new agenda for sustainability. Ashgate Pub Company.
-
- Akbar, M., Utary, C., Kakerissa, Y., & Asmal, S. (2019). Priorities of road network development to support national food flows in Merauke district with SWOT and AHP methods. IOP conference series: earth and environmental science. IOP Publishing.
-
- Aksu GA, Küçük N. Evaluation of urban topography–biotope–population density relations for Istanbul-Beşiktaş urban landscape using AHP. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2020;22(2):733–758. doi: 10.1007/s10668-018-0217-9. - DOI
-
- Alipouri E, Sarvar R, ValiShariatPanahi M. Analysis, measurement, and evaluation of sustainable development in Aleshtar city using AHP-Fuzzy and TOPSIS models. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications. 2020;11(1):497–510.
-
- Altaş, N. (2015). Coğrafi çevre unsurlarıyla şehirleşme etkileşimi bakımından Erzurum şehri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources