Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Oct;104(4):327-336.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 19.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a copper intrauterine contraceptive system releasing ulipristal acetate: A randomized proof-of-concept study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a copper intrauterine contraceptive system releasing ulipristal acetate: A randomized proof-of-concept study

Vivian Brache et al. Contraception. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic outcomes of a novel copper (Cu) intrauterine system (IUS) releasing ulipristal acetate (UPA) in healthy women.

Study design: In this single-blinded, randomized proof-of-concept study, ovulatory women received one of three Cu-IUSs releasing low-dose UPA (5, 20 or 40 µg/d) for 12 weeks. The study included a baseline cycle, three 4-week treatment-cycles and 2 recovery cycles. Primary outcomes included effects of the IUS on bleeding profile, ovarian function, and the occurrence of progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes (PAEC). Pharmacokinetics and safety profile were secondary outcomes. We compared outcomes in treatment-cycle 3 with baseline, using generalized linear mixed models with orthogonal contrasts.

Results: We randomized 29 women (5 µg/d = 10, 20 µg/d = 10, 40 µg/d = 9). All had a successful IUS insertion; 27 completed the 12-week treatment period. Compared to baseline, the mean number of bleeding-only days at treatment-cycle 3 declined by 16.7% in the 5 µg/d group (3.6 vs 3.0, p = 0.66), 40.5% in the 20 µg/d group (4.2 vs 2.5, p = 0.14), and 77% in the 40 µg/d group (3.9 vs 0.9, p = 0.002). Most women reported reduction in the amount of bleeding: 4/8, 8/10, and 7/9 for the 5 µg/d, 20 µg/d, and 40 µg/d groups, respectively. During IUS use, ovulation occurred in most cycles [5 µg/d: 23/24 (96%), 20 µg/d: 26/30 (87%), 40 µg/d: 22/27 (81%)]. The frequency of PAEC at IUS removal was 1/10 (10%), 1/10 (10%) and 4/9 (44%) in the 5 µg/d, 20 µg/d, and 4 0 µg/d groups, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions: Reduction in bleeding, low incidence of PAEC, and no serious adverse events are reassuring findings of the novel Cu-UPA-IUS. The 20 µg/d seems the lowest dose promoting a favorable bleeding profile and limiting PAEC.

Implications: The preliminary results of this short-term study of a novel copper intrauterine system (IUS) delivering ulipristal acetate showed reduction of bleeding, low incidence of progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes, and absence of serious adverse events. By preventing copper-induced increase in bleeding, this IUS could provide a noncontraceptive benefit, especially for women with low hemoglobin.

Keywords: Bleeding profile; Copper intrauterine device; Pharmacokinetic; Progesterone receptor modulator associated endometrial changes; Ulipristal acetate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 -
Figure 1 -
Study flowchart
Figure 2 –
Figure 2 –
Percentage of change in the number of bleeding and spotting days from baseline to treatment cycle 3 for each participant according to ulipristal dose released by a copper intrauterine system
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean ulipristal acetate concentration according to the ulipristal acetate dose released by a copper intrauterine system (Panel A: Plasma samples; Panel B: Endometrial samples)

References

    1. Committee on Gynecologic Practice Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. Committee Opinion No. 642: Increasing Access to Contraceptive Implants and Intrauterine Devices to Reduce Unintended Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015;126:e44–48. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Buckel C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al.Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998–2007. 10.1056/NEJMoa1110855. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson K, Odlind V, Rybo G. Levonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova T) IUDs during five years of use: a randomized comparative trial. Contraception 1994;49:56–72. - PubMed
    1. Rowe P, Farley T, Peregoudov A, Piaggio G, Boccard S, Landoulsi S, et al.Safety and efficacy in parous women of a 52-mg levonorgestrel-medicated intrauterine device: a 7-year randomized comparative study with the TCu380A. Contraception 2016;93:498–506. 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.024. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sivin I, el Mahgoub S, McCarthy T, Mishell DR, Shoupe D, Alvarez F, et al.Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study. Contraception 1990;42:361–78. 10.1016/0010-7824(90)90046-x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types